Assess whether procurement should fail a vendor lacking eval rights (414ba2)

SITUATION A scorecard that rated 100% of outputs 'acceptable' put enterprise AI risk register with missing owners in front of AI committee secretariat in a manufacturer sunsetting a vision model still used in QA. This AI Governance Layer / Audit and Vendor Terms close is procurement should fail a from enterprise AI risk register with missing owners, and the live options are Policy or governance breach, Model defect, Dual failure.

DECISION AI committee secretariat in a manufacturer sunsetting a vision model still used in QA must choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact using enterprise AI risk register with missing owners after a scorecard that rated 100% of outputs 'acceptable'.

HYPOTHESES TO TEST 1. Authorize Policy or governance breach now; enterprise AI risk register with missing owners already has the discriminator after a scorecard that rated 100% of outputs 'acceptable'. 2. Keep Model defect in force until enterprise AI risk register with missing owners is completed after a scorecard that rated 100% of outputs 'acceptable' for AI committee secretariat. 3. Treat enterprise AI risk register with missing owners as Dual failure because both readings appear after a scorecard that rated 100% of outputs 'acceptable'. 4. Refuse a AI Governance Layer close: AI committee secretariat does not have the decision procurement should fail a turns on in enterprise AI risk register with missing owners.

ANALYSIS REQUIRED 1. Map the control-plane score in enterprise AI risk register with missing owners to the policy gate AI committee secretariat can enforce. 2. Name the override that would let procurement should fail a proceed without a silent bypass. 3. Test whether a scorecard that rated 100% of outputs 'acceptable' changed routing, logging, or human-in-the-loop on the live agent path. 4. For this AI Governance Layer Audit and Vendor Terms file, read enterprise AI risk register with missing owners against a scorecard that rated 100% of outputs 'acceptable' and write the one fact that would move procurement should fail a for AI committee secretariat.

RECOMMENDATION Choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact on this AI Governance Layer / Audit and Vendor Terms packet (enterprise AI risk register with missing owners after a scorecard that rated 100% of outputs 'acceptable'). If enterprise AI risk register with missing owners cannot force a AI Governance Layer label under Audit and Vendor Terms, stop. If enterprise AI risk register with missing owners after a scorecard that rated 100% of outputs 'acceptable' cannot support Policy or governance breach versus Model defect on this AI Governance Layer Audit and Vendor Terms close, AI committee secretariat must leave the classification unresolved and name the missing control or provenance fact.