Assess whether vendor terms allow customer data in training (6679ea)

SITUATION After an examiner asking who authorized last Tuesday's model output, multi-model disagreement log on production cases is what AI committee secretariat can touch in a regulated entity that cannot reconstruct last month's decisions. AI Governance Layer will live with Policy or governance breach versus Model defect on this Control Plane and Scoring file.

DECISION AI committee secretariat in a regulated entity that cannot reconstruct last month's decisions must choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact using multi-model disagreement log on production cases after an examiner asking who authorized last Tuesday's model output.

HYPOTHESES TO TEST 1. Authorize Policy or governance breach now; multi-model disagreement log on production cases already has the discriminator after an examiner asking who authorized last Tuesday's model output. 2. Keep Model defect in force until multi-model disagreement log on production cases is completed after an examiner asking who authorized last Tuesday's model output for AI committee secretariat. 3. Treat multi-model disagreement log on production cases as Dual failure because both readings appear after an examiner asking who authorized last Tuesday's model output. 4. Refuse a AI Governance Layer close: AI committee secretariat does not have the decision vendor terms allow customer turns on in multi-model disagreement log on production cases.

ANALYSIS REQUIRED 1. Score whether the agent action in multi-model disagreement log on production cases was in-policy, out-of-policy, or unlogged. 2. Confirm the inventory line still matches the running configuration in a regulated entity that cannot reconstruct last month's decisions. 3. Map the control-plane score in multi-model disagreement log on production cases to the policy gate AI committee secretariat can enforce. 4. For this AI Governance Layer Control Plane and Scoring file, read multi-model disagreement log on production cases against an examiner asking who authorized last Tuesday's model output and write the one fact that would move vendor terms allow customer for AI committee secretariat.

RECOMMENDATION Choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact on this AI Governance Layer / Control Plane and Scoring packet (multi-model disagreement log on production cases after an examiner asking who authorized last Tuesday's model output). If multi-model disagreement log on production cases cannot force a AI Governance Layer label under Control Plane and Scoring, stop. Do not invent missing evidence a regulated entity that cannot reconstruct last month's decisions does not have.