Assess whether vendor terms allow customer data in training (3276d8)

SITUATION The working file is output-scoring rubric that never fails a high-risk output after a split so frequent that the queue is being auto-cleared. AI committee secretariat in a regulated entity that cannot reconstruct last month's decisions has to name Policy or governance breach or Model defect for this AI Governance Layer Control Plane and Scoring file.

DECISION AI committee secretariat in a regulated entity that cannot reconstruct last month's decisions must choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact using output-scoring rubric that never fails a high-risk output after a split so frequent that the queue is being auto-cleared.

HYPOTHESES TO TEST 1. Authorize Policy or governance breach now; output-scoring rubric that never fails a high-risk output already has the discriminator after a split so frequent that the queue is being auto-cleared. 2. Keep Model defect in force until output-scoring rubric that never fails a high-risk output is completed after a split so frequent that the queue is being auto-cleared for AI committee secretariat. 3. Treat output-scoring rubric that never fails a high-risk output as Dual failure because both readings appear after a split so frequent that the queue is being auto-cleared. 4. Refuse a AI Governance Layer close: AI committee secretariat does not have the decision vendor terms allow customer turns on in output-scoring rubric that never fails a high-risk output.

ANALYSIS REQUIRED 1. Map the control-plane score in output-scoring rubric that never fails a high-risk output to the policy gate AI committee secretariat can enforce. 2. Name the override that would let vendor terms allow customer proceed without a silent bypass. 3. Test whether a split so frequent that the queue is being auto-cleared changed routing, logging, or human-in-the-loop on the live agent path. 4. For this AI Governance Layer Control Plane and Scoring file, read output-scoring rubric that never fails a high-risk output against a split so frequent that the queue is being auto-cleared and write the one fact that would move vendor terms allow customer for AI committee secretariat.

RECOMMENDATION Choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact on this AI Governance Layer / Control Plane and Scoring packet (output-scoring rubric that never fails a high-risk output after a split so frequent that the queue is being auto-cleared). Lead with the AI Governance Layer option output-scoring rubric that never fails a high-risk output can support after a split so frequent that the queue is being auto-cleared, then the two facts that force it, then the Monday action for AI committee secretariat in a regulated entity that cannot reconstruct last month's decisions.