Assess whether an agent may take actions without a human gate (89aa8f)

Situation

A new use case bolted onto a model approved for a narrower purpose put vendor model card with missing evaluation slices in front of board AI liaison in a retailer using generative AI in customer service. This AI Governance / Policy and Oversight close is an agent may take from vendor model card with missing evaluation slices, and the live options are Policy or governance breach, Model defect, Dual failure.

Decision

Board AI liaison in a retailer using generative AI in customer service must choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact using vendor model card with missing evaluation slices after a new use case bolted onto a model approved for a narrower purpose.

Hypotheses to test

• Vendor model card with missing evaluation slices reads as Policy or governance breach once a new use case bolted onto a model approved for a narrower purpose is lined up to the same AI Governance population.
• Vendor model card with missing evaluation slices is closer to Model defect after a new use case bolted onto a model approved for a narrower purpose; Policy or governance breach would over-claim this Policy and Oversight extract.
• Dual failure is still live in vendor model card with missing evaluation slices for board AI liaison in a retailer using generative AI in customer service.
• Vendor model card with missing evaluation slices is missing the fact board AI liaison needs after a new use case bolted onto a model approved for a narrower purpose; stop this AI Governance close.

Analysis required

• Walk the model input/output path recorded in vendor model card with missing evaluation slices and mark each hop approved, shadow, or unlogged.
• Verify data provenance and the human-oversight gate board AI liaison can actually point to.
• Walk the model input/output path recorded in vendor model card with missing evaluation slices and mark each hop approved, shadow, or unlogged.
• For this AI Governance Policy and Oversight file, read vendor model card with missing evaluation slices against a new use case bolted onto a model approved for a narrower purpose and write the one fact that would move an agent may take for board AI liaison.

Recommendation

Choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact on this AI Governance / Policy and Oversight packet (vendor model card with missing evaluation slices after a new use case bolted onto a model approved for a narrower purpose). The follow-on Policy and Oversight action is what board AI liaison does next: implement the option, assign an owner, and log the missing fact.

Command returns

• Bottom-line AI Governance option on an agent may take, then the evidence in vendor model card with missing evaluation slices, then the action for board AI liaison
• Hypothesis scorecard against vendor model card with missing evaluation slices: supported / rejected / untestable
• Regulatory or exam hook Policy and Oversight would cite
• Policy and Oversight finding in vendor model card with missing evaluation slices that a second reviewer can re-perform