Assess whether a shadow system must be decommissioned this quarter (6f2a6f)

Situation

Board AI liaison owns a shadow system must inside a bank preparing for a model-risk exam with EU AI Act high-risk classification worksheet as the only packet. An examiner request for the current model inventory is what changed the clock for this AI Governance Vendors and Agentic Systems file.

Decision

Board AI liaison in a bank preparing for a model-risk exam must choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact using EU AI Act high-risk classification worksheet after an examiner request for the current model inventory.

Hypotheses to test

• The population in EU AI Act high-risk classification worksheet is the one an examiner request for the current model inventory named, so Policy or governance breach follows for this Vendors and Agentic Systems file.
• The population in EU AI Act high-risk classification worksheet is adjacent only to an examiner request for the current model inventory; Model defect is the honest AI Governance call.
• A bank preparing for a model-risk exam already contained an examiner request for the current model inventory before EU AI Act high-risk classification worksheet arrived; no new Vendors and Agentic Systems path.
• Provenance on EU AI Act high-risk classification worksheet after an examiner request for the current model inventory is broken; do not pick Policy or governance breach or Model defect yet.

Analysis required

• Split policy-or-governance failure from a model defect using prompts, outputs, and human edits in EU AI Act high-risk classification worksheet.
• Reproduce the incident row in EU AI Act high-risk classification worksheet and say whether it ever touched production data.
• Split policy-or-governance failure from a model defect using prompts, outputs, and human edits in EU AI Act high-risk classification worksheet.
• For this AI Governance Vendors and Agentic Systems file, read EU AI Act high-risk classification worksheet against an examiner request for the current model inventory and write the one fact that would move a shadow system must for board AI liaison.

Recommendation

Choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact on this AI Governance / Vendors and Agentic Systems packet (EU AI Act high-risk classification worksheet after an examiner request for the current model inventory). The follow-on Vendors and Agentic Systems action is what board AI liaison does next: implement the option, assign an owner, and log the missing fact.

Command returns

• Bottom-line AI Governance option on a shadow system must, then the evidence in EU AI Act high-risk classification worksheet, then the action for board AI liaison
• Hypothesis scorecard against EU AI Act high-risk classification worksheet: supported / rejected / untestable
• Owner and next date for board AI liaison in a bank preparing for a model-risk exam
• What changes a shadow system must if an examiner request for the current model inventory is later withdrawn