Assess whether training data has a lawful basis and documented lineage

SITUATION Incident log of hallucinated citations in a legal memo arrived with a new use case bolted onto a model approved for a narrower purpose for board AI liaison. That is a AI Governance Vendors and Agentic Systems decision on training data has a in a bank preparing for a model-risk exam.

DECISION Board AI liaison in a bank preparing for a model-risk exam must choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact using incident log of hallucinated citations in a legal memo after a new use case bolted onto a model approved for a narrower purpose.

HYPOTHESES TO TEST 1. The population in incident log of hallucinated citations in a legal memo is the one a new use case bolted onto a model approved for a narrower purpose named, so Policy or governance breach follows for this Vendors and Agentic Systems file. 2. The population in incident log of hallucinated citations in a legal memo is adjacent only to a new use case bolted onto a model approved for a narrower purpose; Model defect is the honest AI Governance call. 3. A bank preparing for a model-risk exam already contained a new use case bolted onto a model approved for a narrower purpose before incident log of hallucinated citations in a legal memo arrived; no new Vendors and Agentic Systems path. 4. Provenance on incident log of hallucinated citations in a legal memo after a new use case bolted onto a model approved for a narrower purpose is broken; do not pick Policy or governance breach or Model defect yet.

ANALYSIS REQUIRED 1. Split policy-or-governance failure from a model defect using prompts, outputs, and human edits in incident log of hallucinated citations in a legal memo. 2. Reproduce the incident row in incident log of hallucinated citations in a legal memo and say whether it ever touched production data. 3. Split policy-or-governance failure from a model defect using prompts, outputs, and human edits in incident log of hallucinated citations in a legal memo. 4. For this AI Governance Vendors and Agentic Systems file, read incident log of hallucinated citations in a legal memo against a new use case bolted onto a model approved for a narrower purpose and write the one fact that would move training data has a for board AI liaison.

RECOMMENDATION Choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact on this AI Governance / Vendors and Agentic Systems packet (incident log of hallucinated citations in a legal memo after a new use case bolted onto a model approved for a narrower purpose). The follow-on Vendors and Agentic Systems action is what board AI liaison does next: implement the option, assign an owner, and log the missing fact.