Assess whether past performance will score or be deemed not relevant (be1d45)

Situation

Past performance will score sits with capture manager because a data-rights assertion the customer already rejected last year hit an incumbent defending a recompete with thin past performance. Evidence is teaming agreement with IP and workshare holes; write the Government RFP Performance and Teaming option that extract can carry.

Decision

Capture manager in an incumbent defending a recompete with thin past performance must choose Past performance will score / Be deemed not relevant using teaming agreement with IP and workshare holes after a data-rights assertion the customer already rejected last year.

Hypotheses to test

• Capture manager can defend Past performance will score from teaming agreement with IP and workshare holes after a data-rights assertion the customer already rejected last year in a Government RFP challenge.
• Capture manager cannot defend Past performance will score from teaming agreement with IP and workshare holes; Be deemed not relevant is what the extract actually supports after a data-rights assertion the customer already rejected last year.
• A data-rights assertion the customer already rejected last year never reached the population in teaming agreement with IP and workshare holes — reopen intake, do not close past performance will score.
• Two facts in teaming agreement with IP and workshare holes after a data-rights assertion the customer already rejected last year conflict for capture manager; hold this Performance and Teaming file.

Analysis required

• Map Section L/M requirements in teaming agreement with IP and workshare holes to evaluator notes after a data-rights assertion the customer already rejected last year.
• Compare teaming and past-performance claims to what teaming agreement with IP and workshare holes attaches.
• Normalize pricing and exceptions against the solicitation that governs past performance will score.
• For this Government RFP Performance and Teaming file, read teaming agreement with IP and workshare holes against a data-rights assertion the customer already rejected last year and write the one fact that would move past performance will score for capture manager.

Recommendation

Choose Past performance will score / Be deemed not relevant on this Government RFP / Performance and Teaming packet (teaming agreement with IP and workshare holes after a data-rights assertion the customer already rejected last year). Lead with the Government RFP option teaming agreement with IP and workshare holes can support after a data-rights assertion the customer already rejected last year, then the two facts that force it, then the Monday action for capture manager in an incumbent defending a recompete with thin past performance.