Assess whether the SBIR data-rights assertions are too aggressive (0a391d)

Situation

A subcontracting goal the supply base cannot hit put teaming agreement with IP and workshare holes in front of capture manager in an incumbent defending a recompete with thin past performance. This Government RFP / Performance and Teaming close is the SBIR data-rights assertions from teaming agreement with IP and workshare holes, and the live options are Pursue, Pursue with conditions, Partner.

Decision

Capture manager in an incumbent defending a recompete with thin past performance must choose Pursue / Pursue with conditions / Partner / No-bid using teaming agreement with IP and workshare holes after a subcontracting goal the supply base cannot hit.

Hypotheses to test

• The population in teaming agreement with IP and workshare holes is the one a subcontracting goal the supply base cannot hit named, so Pursue follows for this Performance and Teaming file.
• The population in teaming agreement with IP and workshare holes is adjacent only to a subcontracting goal the supply base cannot hit; Pursue with conditions is the honest Government RFP call.
• An incumbent defending a recompete with thin past performance already contained a subcontracting goal the supply base cannot hit before teaming agreement with IP and workshare holes arrived; no new Performance and Teaming path.
• Provenance on teaming agreement with IP and workshare holes after a subcontracting goal the supply base cannot hit is broken; do not pick Pursue or Pursue with conditions yet.

Analysis required

• Compare teaming and past-performance claims to what teaming agreement with IP and workshare holes attaches.
• Normalize pricing and exceptions against the solicitation that governs the SBIR data-rights assertions.
• Score competitive posture if capture manager pursues, partners, or no-bids.
• For this Government RFP Performance and Teaming file, read teaming agreement with IP and workshare holes against a subcontracting goal the supply base cannot hit and write the one fact that would move the SBIR data-rights assertions for capture manager.

Recommendation

Choose Pursue / Pursue with conditions / Partner / No-bid on this Government RFP / Performance and Teaming packet (teaming agreement with IP and workshare holes after a subcontracting goal the supply base cannot hit). The follow-on Performance and Teaming action is what capture manager does next: implement the option, assign an owner, and log the missing fact.