Assess whether deprecation of a legacy scorecard creates a governance gap

Situation

Deprecation of a legacy sits with chief AI officer because a vendor SOC report that excludes the actual model host region hit a bank preparing for a model-risk exam. Evidence is training-data provenance questionnaire; write the AI Governance Inventory and Regulatory Fit option that extract can carry.

Decision

Chief AI officer in a bank preparing for a model-risk exam must choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact using training-data provenance questionnaire after a vendor SOC report that excludes the actual model host region.

Hypotheses to test

• Chief AI officer can defend Policy or governance breach from training-data provenance questionnaire after a vendor SOC report that excludes the actual model host region in a AI Governance challenge.
• Chief AI officer cannot defend Policy or governance breach from training-data provenance questionnaire; Model defect is what the extract actually supports after a vendor SOC report that excludes the actual model host region.
• A vendor SOC report that excludes the actual model host region never reached the population in training-data provenance questionnaire — reopen intake, do not close deprecation of a legacy.
• Two facts in training-data provenance questionnaire after a vendor SOC report that excludes the actual model host region conflict for chief AI officer; hold this Inventory and Regulatory Fit file.

Analysis required

• Check intended purpose and inventory status against EU AI Act / exam-readiness language after a vendor SOC report that excludes the actual model host region.
• Map the approved-use case to the system deprecation of a legacy would bind.
• Check intended purpose and inventory status against EU AI Act / exam-readiness language after a vendor SOC report that excludes the actual model host region.
• For this AI Governance Inventory and Regulatory Fit file, read training-data provenance questionnaire against a vendor SOC report that excludes the actual model host region and write the one fact that would move deprecation of a legacy for chief AI officer.

Recommendation

Choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact on this AI Governance / Inventory and Regulatory Fit packet (training-data provenance questionnaire after a vendor SOC report that excludes the actual model host region). If training-data provenance questionnaire cannot force a AI Governance label under Inventory and Regulatory Fit, stop. Do not invent pages a bank preparing for a model-risk exam does not have.

Command returns

• Bottom-line AI Governance option on deprecation of a legacy, then the evidence in training-data provenance questionnaire, then the action for chief AI officer
• Hypothesis scorecard against training-data provenance questionnaire: supported / rejected / untestable
• Regulatory or exam hook Inventory and Regulatory Fit would cite
• Inventory and Regulatory Fit finding in training-data provenance questionnaire that a second reviewer can re-perform