Assess whether IP is owned or merely licensed (c617f6)
August 31, 2026 · SmartSolo
Situation
IP is owned or merely licensed sits with commercial-diligence partner because add-backs that are just delayed opex hit a cross-border deal with earnout-heavy structure. Evidence is customer concentration and termination-for-convenience clauses; write the M&A Due Diligence Legal, IP, and Regulatory option that extract can carry.
Decision
Commercial-diligence partner in a cross-border deal with earnout-heavy structure must choose IP is owned / Merely licensed using customer concentration and termination-for-convenience clauses after add-backs that are just delayed opex.
Hypotheses to test
- The population in customer concentration and termination-for-convenience clauses is the one add-backs that are just delayed opex named, so IP is owned follows for this Legal, IP, and Regulatory file.
- The population in customer concentration and termination-for-convenience clauses is adjacent only to add-backs that are just delayed opex; Merely licensed is the honest M&A Due Diligence call.
- A cross-border deal with earnout-heavy structure already contained add-backs that are just delayed opex before customer concentration and termination-for-convenience clauses arrived; no new Legal, IP, and Regulatory path.
- Provenance on customer concentration and termination-for-convenience clauses after add-backs that are just delayed opex is broken; do not pick IP is owned or Merely licensed yet.
Analysis required
- Map reps, earnout mechanics, and integration risk a cross-border deal with earnout-heavy structure would inherit.
- Tie quality-of-earnings, working-capital, and contingent items in customer concentration and termination-for-convenience clauses to IP is owned or merely licensed.
- Name the document commercial-diligence partner still needs before signing.
- For this M&A Due Diligence Legal, IP, and Regulatory file, read customer concentration and termination-for-convenience clauses against add-backs that are just delayed opex and write the one fact that would move IP is owned or merely licensed for commercial-diligence partner.
Recommendation
Choose IP is owned / Merely licensed on this M&A Due Diligence / Legal, IP, and Regulatory packet (customer concentration and termination-for-convenience clauses after add-backs that are just delayed opex). The follow-on Legal, IP, and Regulatory action is what commercial-diligence partner does next: implement the option, assign an owner, and log the missing fact.
Explore more
More M&A Due Diligence prompts
- Assess whether environmental liability is capped or open-ended (ae09c8)
- Assess whether integration costs were sandbagged in the CIM (727c77)
- Assess whether working capital should be a walk-away (f6bf6f)
- Assess whether a top customer is actually sticky (974637)
- Assess whether working capital should be a walk-away (6f7f1d)
Explore related decision areas
- Assess whether cash ever economically changed hands (eafb8c)Forensic Accounting
- Assess whether the audit committee must be briefed this week (2f909e)Forensic Accounting
- Treaty pricing actuary must resolve whether a warranty should be convertedInsurance Underwriting
See governed multi-model AI on your own prompt
Compare GPT-5, Claude, and Gemini side by side, with human review and a decision record built in.

