Assess whether key personnel substitutions will trigger evaluation risk

Situation

The desk packet is past-performance recency and relevance scorecard after a key person who just resigned. Contracts officer supporting a bid in a lab competing a Phase II SBIR has to name Pursue or Pursue with conditions for this Government RFP Performance and Teaming file.

Decision

Contracts officer supporting a bid in a lab competing a Phase II SBIR must choose Pursue / Pursue with conditions / Partner / No-bid using past-performance recency and relevance scorecard after a key person who just resigned.

Hypotheses to test

• Contracts officer supporting a bid can defend Pursue from past-performance recency and relevance scorecard after a key person who just resigned in a Government RFP challenge.
• Contracts officer supporting a bid cannot defend Pursue from past-performance recency and relevance scorecard; Pursue with conditions is what the extract actually supports after a key person who just resigned.
• A key person who just resigned never reached the population in past-performance recency and relevance scorecard — reopen intake, do not close key personnel substitutions will.
• Two facts in past-performance recency and relevance scorecard after a key person who just resigned conflict for contracts officer supporting a bid; hold this Performance and Teaming file.

Analysis required

• Map Section L/M requirements in past-performance recency and relevance scorecard to evaluator notes after a key person who just resigned.
• Compare teaming and past-performance claims to what past-performance recency and relevance scorecard attaches.
• Normalize pricing and exceptions against the solicitation that governs key personnel substitutions will.
• For this Government RFP Performance and Teaming file, read past-performance recency and relevance scorecard against a key person who just resigned and write the one fact that would move key personnel substitutions will for contracts officer supporting a bid.

Recommendation

Choose Pursue / Pursue with conditions / Partner / No-bid on this Government RFP / Performance and Teaming packet (past-performance recency and relevance scorecard after a key person who just resigned). If past-performance recency and relevance scorecard cannot force a Government RFP label under Performance and Teaming, stop. If past-performance recency and relevance scorecard after a key person who just resigned cannot support Pursue versus Pursue with conditions on this Government RFP Performance and Teaming close, contracts officer supporting a bid must identify the Section L/M or evaluation criterion that remains unproven rather than filling the gap.