Assess whether the committee can overrule a business unit (6373cf)

SITUATION Decision-audit designer in a hospital committee that never records dissent has one working extract — reconciliation policy when two models split on materiality — after a customer discovering AI copy with no disclosure. If reconciliation policy when two models split on materiality cannot support the committee can overrule, the only defensible AI Governance Layer output is hold.

DECISION Decision-audit designer in a hospital committee that never records dissent must choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact using reconciliation policy when two models split on materiality after a customer discovering AI copy with no disclosure.

HYPOTHESES TO TEST 1. Authorize Policy or governance breach now; reconciliation policy when two models split on materiality already has the discriminator after a customer discovering AI copy with no disclosure. 2. Keep Model defect in force until reconciliation policy when two models split on materiality is completed after a customer discovering AI copy with no disclosure for decision-audit designer. 3. Treat reconciliation policy when two models split on materiality as Dual failure because both readings appear after a customer discovering AI copy with no disclosure. 4. Refuse a AI Governance Layer close: decision-audit designer does not have the decision the committee can overrule turns on in reconciliation policy when two models split on materiality.

ANALYSIS REQUIRED 1. Test whether a customer discovering AI copy with no disclosure changed routing, logging, or human-in-the-loop on the live agent path. 2. Score whether the agent action in reconciliation policy when two models split on materiality was in-policy, out-of-policy, or unlogged. 3. Confirm the inventory line still matches the running configuration in a hospital committee that never records dissent. 4. For this AI Governance Layer Audit and Vendor Terms file, read reconciliation policy when two models split on materiality against a customer discovering AI copy with no disclosure and write the one fact that would move the committee can overrule for decision-audit designer.

RECOMMENDATION Choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact on this AI Governance Layer / Audit and Vendor Terms packet (reconciliation policy when two models split on materiality after a customer discovering AI copy with no disclosure). Lead with the AI Governance Layer option reconciliation policy when two models split on materiality can support after a customer discovering AI copy with no disclosure, then the two facts that force it, then the Monday action for decision-audit designer in a hospital committee that never records dissent.