Assess whether the control plane actually controls production traffic (021c67)

SITUATION Multi-model disagreement log on production cases arrived with two production models recommending opposite actions on the same file. Decision-audit designer in a company whose agents can send email without a gate still has an evidence gap on whether the control plane actually controls production traffic.

DECISION Decision-audit designer in a company whose agents can send email without a gate must choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact using multi-model disagreement log on production cases after two production models recommending opposite actions on the same file.

HYPOTHESES TO TEST 1. The population in multi-model disagreement log on production cases is the one two production models recommending opposite actions on the same file named, so Policy or governance breach follows for this Lifecycle and Accountability file. 2. The population in multi-model disagreement log on production cases is adjacent only to two production models recommending opposite actions on the same file; Model defect is the honest AI Governance Layer call. 3. A company whose agents can send email without a gate already contained two production models recommending opposite actions on the same file before multi-model disagreement log on production cases arrived; no new Lifecycle and Accountability path. 4. Provenance on multi-model disagreement log on production cases after two production models recommending opposite actions on the same file is broken; do not pick Policy or governance breach or Model defect yet.

ANALYSIS REQUIRED 1. Name the override that would let the control plane actually proceed without a silent bypass. 2. Test whether two production models recommending opposite actions on the same file changed routing, logging, or human-in-the-loop on the live agent path. 3. Score whether the agent action in multi-model disagreement log on production cases was in-policy, out-of-policy, or unlogged. 4. For this AI Governance Layer Lifecycle and Accountability file, read multi-model disagreement log on production cases against two production models recommending opposite actions on the same file and write the one fact that would move the control plane actually for decision-audit designer.

RECOMMENDATION Choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact on this AI Governance Layer / Lifecycle and Accountability packet (multi-model disagreement log on production cases after two production models recommending opposite actions on the same file). Lead with the AI Governance Layer option multi-model disagreement log on production cases can support after two production models recommending opposite actions on the same file, then the two facts that force it, then the Monday action for decision-audit designer in a company whose agents can send email without a gate.