Assess whether vendor terms allow customer data in training (aede61)

SITUATION After a purchase order signed before eval data rights were granted, decision-audit trail with gaps at the human-gate step is what decision-audit designer can touch in a firm whose vendor MSA is silent on training rights. AI Governance Layer will live with Policy or governance breach versus Model defect on this Control Plane and Scoring file.

DECISION Decision-audit designer in a firm whose vendor MSA is silent on training rights must choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact using decision-audit trail with gaps at the human-gate step after a purchase order signed before eval data rights were granted.

HYPOTHESES TO TEST 1. A purchase order signed before eval data rights were granted is noise around an already-controlled Control Plane and Scoring process in a firm whose vendor MSA is silent on training rights, given decision-audit trail with gaps at the human-gate step. 2. A purchase order signed before eval data rights were granted is the event in decision-audit trail with gaps at the human-gate step that forces Policy or governance breach for decision-audit designer under AI Governance Layer. 3. Decision-audit trail with gaps at the human-gate step shows a one-file miss after a purchase order signed before eval data rights were granted, not a Control Plane and Scoring program failure. 4. Decision-audit trail with gaps at the human-gate step cannot decide vendor terms allow customer yet after a purchase order signed before eval data rights were granted; hold is the only AI Governance Layer close a firm whose vendor MSA is silent on training rights can defend.

ANALYSIS REQUIRED 1. Confirm the inventory line still matches the running configuration in a firm whose vendor MSA is silent on training rights. 2. Map the control-plane score in decision-audit trail with gaps at the human-gate step to the policy gate decision-audit designer can enforce. 3. Name the override that would let vendor terms allow customer proceed without a silent bypass. 4. For this AI Governance Layer Control Plane and Scoring file, read decision-audit trail with gaps at the human-gate step against a purchase order signed before eval data rights were granted and write the one fact that would move vendor terms allow customer for decision-audit designer.

RECOMMENDATION Choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact on this AI Governance Layer / Control Plane and Scoring packet (decision-audit trail with gaps at the human-gate step after a purchase order signed before eval data rights were granted). The follow-on Control Plane and Scoring action is what decision-audit designer does next: implement the option, assign an owner, and log the missing fact.