Assess whether vendor terms allow customer data in training (f5c132)

SITUATION Output-scoring rubric that never fails a high-risk output arrived with a committee that has not met since the last incident for decision-audit designer. That is a AI Governance Layer Audit and Vendor Terms decision on vendor terms allow customer in a hospital committee that never records dissent.

DECISION Decision-audit designer in a hospital committee that never records dissent must choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact using output-scoring rubric that never fails a high-risk output after a committee that has not met since the last incident.

HYPOTHESES TO TEST 1. A committee that has not met since the last incident is noise around an already-controlled Audit and Vendor Terms process in a hospital committee that never records dissent, given output-scoring rubric that never fails a high-risk output. 2. A committee that has not met since the last incident is the event in output-scoring rubric that never fails a high-risk output that forces Policy or governance breach for decision-audit designer under AI Governance Layer. 3. Output-scoring rubric that never fails a high-risk output shows a one-file miss after a committee that has not met since the last incident, not a Audit and Vendor Terms program failure. 4. Output-scoring rubric that never fails a high-risk output cannot decide vendor terms allow customer yet after a committee that has not met since the last incident; hold is the only AI Governance Layer close a hospital committee that never records dissent can defend.

ANALYSIS REQUIRED 1. Map the control-plane score in output-scoring rubric that never fails a high-risk output to the policy gate decision-audit designer can enforce. 2. Name the override that would let vendor terms allow customer proceed without a silent bypass. 3. Test whether a committee that has not met since the last incident changed routing, logging, or human-in-the-loop on the live agent path. 4. For this AI Governance Layer Audit and Vendor Terms file, read output-scoring rubric that never fails a high-risk output against a committee that has not met since the last incident and write the one fact that would move vendor terms allow customer for decision-audit designer.

RECOMMENDATION Choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact on this AI Governance Layer / Audit and Vendor Terms packet (output-scoring rubric that never fails a high-risk output after a committee that has not met since the last incident). Lead with the AI Governance Layer option output-scoring rubric that never fails a high-risk output can support after a committee that has not met since the last incident, then the two facts that force it, then the Monday action for decision-audit designer in a hospital committee that never records dissent.