Assess whether agents must have a human gate for external actions (d79fc7)

Situation

Agents must have a human gate sits with decision-audit designer because a vendor that changed subprocessors without notice hit a company whose agents can send email without a gate. Evidence is decision-audit trail with gaps at the human-gate step; write the AI Governance Layer Lifecycle and Accountability option that extract can carry.

Decision

Decision-audit designer in a company whose agents can send email without a gate must choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact using decision-audit trail with gaps at the human-gate step after a vendor that changed subprocessors without notice.

Hypotheses to test

• The population in decision-audit trail with gaps at the human-gate step is the one a vendor that changed subprocessors without notice named, so Policy or governance breach follows for this Lifecycle and Accountability file.
• The population in decision-audit trail with gaps at the human-gate step is adjacent only to a vendor that changed subprocessors without notice; Model defect is the honest AI Governance Layer call.
• A company whose agents can send email without a gate already contained a vendor that changed subprocessors without notice before decision-audit trail with gaps at the human-gate step arrived; no new Lifecycle and Accountability path.
• Provenance on decision-audit trail with gaps at the human-gate step after a vendor that changed subprocessors without notice is broken; do not pick Policy or governance breach or Model defect yet.

Analysis required

• Map the control-plane score in decision-audit trail with gaps at the human-gate step to the policy gate decision-audit designer can enforce.
• Name the override that would let agents must have a human gate proceed without a silent bypass.
• Test whether a vendor that changed subprocessors without notice changed routing, logging, or human-in-the-loop on the live agent path.
• For this AI Governance Layer Lifecycle and Accountability file, read decision-audit trail with gaps at the human-gate step against a vendor that changed subprocessors without notice and write the one fact that would move agents must have a human gate for decision-audit designer.

Recommendation

Choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact on this AI Governance Layer / Lifecycle and Accountability packet (decision-audit trail with gaps at the human-gate step after a vendor that changed subprocessors without notice). Lead with the AI Governance Layer option decision-audit trail with gaps at the human-gate step can support after a vendor that changed subprocessors without notice, then the two facts that force it, then the Monday action for decision-audit designer in a company whose agents can send email without a gate.