Assess whether claimed differentiators would survive a fact check (ab91a3)

Situation

Claimed differentiators would survive sits with capture manager because a teammate that cannot meet the facility-clearance requirement hit a lab competing a Phase II SBIR. Evidence is discriminator table that still reads generic; write the Government RFP Protest and Modifications option that extract can carry.

Decision

Capture manager in a lab competing a Phase II SBIR must choose Pursue / Pursue with conditions / Partner / No-bid using discriminator table that still reads generic after a teammate that cannot meet the facility-clearance requirement.

Hypotheses to test

• Discriminator table that still reads generic reads as Pursue once a teammate that cannot meet the facility-clearance requirement is lined up to the same Government RFP population.
• Discriminator table that still reads generic is closer to Pursue with conditions after a teammate that cannot meet the facility-clearance requirement; Pursue would over-claim this Protest and Modifications extract.
• Partner is still live in discriminator table that still reads generic for capture manager in a lab competing a Phase II SBIR.
• Discriminator table that still reads generic is missing the fact capture manager needs after a teammate that cannot meet the facility-clearance requirement; stop this Government RFP close.

Analysis required

• Test OCI, QASP, and mandatory evaluation rights a lab competing a Phase II SBIR cannot waive quietly.
• Map Section L/M requirements in discriminator table that still reads generic to evaluator notes after a teammate that cannot meet the facility-clearance requirement.
• Compare teaming and past-performance claims to what discriminator table that still reads generic attaches.
• For this Government RFP Protest and Modifications file, read discriminator table that still reads generic against a teammate that cannot meet the facility-clearance requirement and write the one fact that would move claimed differentiators would survive for capture manager.

Recommendation

Choose Pursue / Pursue with conditions / Partner / No-bid on this Government RFP / Protest and Modifications packet (discriminator table that still reads generic after a teammate that cannot meet the facility-clearance requirement). If discriminator table that still reads generic cannot force a Government RFP label under Protest and Modifications, stop. If discriminator table that still reads generic after a teammate that cannot meet the facility-clearance requirement cannot support Pursue versus Pursue with conditions on this Government RFP Protest and Modifications close, capture manager must identify the Section L/M or evaluation criterion that remains unproven rather than filling the gap.