Assess whether the SBIR data-rights assertions are too aggressive (aaef34)

SITUATION A task order that looks written for one vendor put discriminator table that still reads generic in front of IDIQ task-order strategist in a company facing a CMMC Level 2 assessment before bid. This Government RFP / Performance and Teaming decision is the SBIR data-rights assertions from discriminator table that still reads generic, and the live options are Pursue, Pursue with conditions, Partner.

DECISION IDIQ task-order strategist in a company facing a CMMC Level 2 assessment before bid must choose Pursue / Pursue with conditions / Partner / No-bid using discriminator table that still reads generic after a task order that looks written for one vendor.

HYPOTHESES TO TEST 1. IDIQ task-order strategist can defend Pursue from discriminator table that still reads generic after a task order that looks written for one vendor in a Government RFP challenge. 2. IDIQ task-order strategist cannot defend Pursue from discriminator table that still reads generic; Pursue with conditions is what the extract actually supports after a task order that looks written for one vendor. 3. A task order that looks written for one vendor never reached the population in discriminator table that still reads generic — reopen intake, do not close the SBIR data-rights assertions. 4. Two facts in discriminator table that still reads generic after a task order that looks written for one vendor conflict for IDIQ task-order strategist; hold this Performance and Teaming file.

ANALYSIS REQUIRED 1. Map Section L/M requirements in discriminator table that still reads generic to evaluator notes after a task order that looks written for one vendor. 2. Compare teaming and past-performance claims to what discriminator table that still reads generic attaches. 3. Normalize pricing and exceptions against the solicitation that governs the SBIR data-rights assertions. 4. For this Government RFP Performance and Teaming file, read discriminator table that still reads generic against a task order that looks written for one vendor and write the one fact that would move the SBIR data-rights assertions for IDIQ task-order strategist.

RECOMMENDATION Choose Pursue / Pursue with conditions / Partner / No-bid on this Government RFP / Performance and Teaming packet (discriminator table that still reads generic after a task order that looks written for one vendor). Lead with the Government RFP option discriminator table that still reads generic can support after a task order that looks written for one vendor, then the two facts that force it, then the Monday action for IDIQ task-order strategist in a company facing a CMMC Level 2 assessment before bid.

COMMAND RETURNS - Bottom-line Government RFP option on the SBIR data-rights assertions, then the evidence in discriminator table that still reads generic, then the action for IDIQ task-order strategist - Hypothesis scorecard against discriminator table that still reads generic: supported / rejected / untestable - Owner and next date for IDIQ task-order strategist in a company facing a CMMC Level 2 assessment before bid - What changes the SBIR data-rights assertions if a task order that looks written for one vendor is later withdrawn