Assess whether hair testing can be used for this employment action (00281d)

SITUATION Specimen Validity work in a company transitioning to oral fluid now turns on hair testing can be used because a SAP who closed the file before follow-up tests finished put oral-fluid cutoff and collection-device validation in play. DOT program-design consultant should say what oral-fluid cutoff and collection-device validation proves.

DECISION DOT program-design consultant in a company transitioning to oral fluid must choose Accept the result / Reject on custody / Recollect / Hold using oral-fluid cutoff and collection-device validation after a SAP who closed the file before follow-up tests finished.

HYPOTHESES TO TEST 1. DOT program-design consultant can defend Accept the result from oral-fluid cutoff and collection-device validation after a SAP who closed the file before follow-up tests finished in a Forensic Drug Testing challenge. 2. DOT program-design consultant cannot defend Accept the result from oral-fluid cutoff and collection-device validation; Reject on custody is what the extract actually supports after a SAP who closed the file before follow-up tests finished. 3. A SAP who closed the file before follow-up tests finished never reached the population in oral-fluid cutoff and collection-device validation — reopen intake, do not close hair testing can be used. 4. Two facts in oral-fluid cutoff and collection-device validation after a SAP who closed the file before follow-up tests finished conflict for DOT program-design consultant; hold this Specimen Validity file.

ANALYSIS REQUIRED 1. Test whether a broken seal, timing miss, or donor explanation changes hair testing can be used. 2. Confirm the kit ID in oral-fluid cutoff and collection-device validation matches the collection log. 3. Check MRO notes and cutoffs against the protocol a company transitioning to oral fluid claims to run. 4. For this Forensic Drug Testing Specimen Validity file, read oral-fluid cutoff and collection-device validation against a SAP who closed the file before follow-up tests finished and write the one fact that would move hair testing can be used for DOT program-design consultant.

RECOMMENDATION Choose Accept the result / Reject on custody / Recollect / Hold on this Forensic Drug Testing / Specimen Validity packet (oral-fluid cutoff and collection-device validation after a SAP who closed the file before follow-up tests finished). The follow-on Specimen Validity action is what DOT program-design consultant does next: implement the option, assign an owner, and log the missing fact.

COMMAND RETURNS - Bottom-line Forensic Drug Testing option on hair testing can be used, then the evidence in oral-fluid cutoff and collection-device validation, then the action for DOT program-design consultant - Hypothesis scorecard against oral-fluid cutoff and collection-device validation: supported / rejected / untestable - What changes hair testing can be used if a SAP who closed the file before follow-up tests finished is later withdrawn - Named option among Accept the result, Reject on custody, Recollect and the fact that kills the others