Assess whether the control plane actually controls production traffic (2e08d8)

SITUATION Two production models recommending opposite actions on the same file put procurement scorecard that ignores eval datasets in front of enterprise AI control-plane owner in a hospital committee that never records dissent. This AI Governance Layer / Lifecycle and Accountability decision is the control plane actually from procurement scorecard that ignores eval datasets, and the live options are Policy or governance breach, Model defect, Dual failure.

DECISION Enterprise AI control-plane owner in a hospital committee that never records dissent must choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact using procurement scorecard that ignores eval datasets after two production models recommending opposite actions on the same file.

HYPOTHESES TO TEST 1. The population in procurement scorecard that ignores eval datasets is the one two production models recommending opposite actions on the same file named, so Policy or governance breach follows for this Lifecycle and Accountability file. 2. The population in procurement scorecard that ignores eval datasets is adjacent only to two production models recommending opposite actions on the same file; Model defect is the honest AI Governance Layer call. 3. A hospital committee that never records dissent already contained two production models recommending opposite actions on the same file before procurement scorecard that ignores eval datasets arrived; no new Lifecycle and Accountability path. 4. Provenance on procurement scorecard that ignores eval datasets after two production models recommending opposite actions on the same file is broken; do not pick Policy or governance breach or Model defect yet.

ANALYSIS REQUIRED 1. Name the override that would let the control plane actually proceed without a silent bypass. 2. Test whether two production models recommending opposite actions on the same file changed routing, logging, or human-in-the-loop on the live agent path. 3. Score whether the agent action in procurement scorecard that ignores eval datasets was in-policy, out-of-policy, or unlogged. 4. For this AI Governance Layer Lifecycle and Accountability file, read procurement scorecard that ignores eval datasets against two production models recommending opposite actions on the same file and write the one fact that would move the control plane actually for enterprise AI control-plane owner.

RECOMMENDATION Choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact on this AI Governance Layer / Lifecycle and Accountability packet (procurement scorecard that ignores eval datasets after two production models recommending opposite actions on the same file). Lead with the AI Governance Layer option procurement scorecard that ignores eval datasets can support after two production models recommending opposite actions on the same file, then the two facts that force it, then the Monday action for enterprise AI control-plane owner in a hospital committee that never records dissent.