Assess whether vendor terms allow customer data in training (79e2b1)

SITUATION In a firm whose vendor MSA is silent on training rights, deprecation plan for a model still in a batch job is the evidence after a committee that has not met since the last incident. Enterprise AI control-plane owner has to pick Policy or governance breach or Model defect for this AI Governance Layer Audit and Vendor Terms close using deprecation plan for a model still in a batch job.

DECISION Enterprise AI control-plane owner in a firm whose vendor MSA is silent on training rights must choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact using deprecation plan for a model still in a batch job after a committee that has not met since the last incident.

HYPOTHESES TO TEST 1. Authorize Policy or governance breach now; deprecation plan for a model still in a batch job already has the discriminator after a committee that has not met since the last incident. 2. Keep Model defect in force until deprecation plan for a model still in a batch job is completed after a committee that has not met since the last incident for enterprise AI control-plane owner. 3. Treat deprecation plan for a model still in a batch job as Dual failure because both readings appear after a committee that has not met since the last incident. 4. Refuse a AI Governance Layer close: enterprise AI control-plane owner does not have the decision vendor terms allow customer turns on in deprecation plan for a model still in a batch job.

ANALYSIS REQUIRED 1. Confirm the inventory line still matches the running configuration in a firm whose vendor MSA is silent on training rights. 2. Map the control-plane score in deprecation plan for a model still in a batch job to the policy gate enterprise AI control-plane owner can enforce. 3. Name the override that would let vendor terms allow customer proceed without a silent bypass. 4. For this AI Governance Layer Audit and Vendor Terms file, read deprecation plan for a model still in a batch job against a committee that has not met since the last incident and write the one fact that would move vendor terms allow customer for enterprise AI control-plane owner.

RECOMMENDATION Choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact on this AI Governance Layer / Audit and Vendor Terms packet (deprecation plan for a model still in a batch job after a committee that has not met since the last incident). The follow-on Audit and Vendor Terms action is what enterprise AI control-plane owner does next: implement the option, assign an owner, and log the missing fact.

COMMAND RETURNS - Bottom-line AI Governance Layer option on vendor terms allow customer, then the evidence in deprecation plan for a model still in a batch job, then the action for enterprise AI control-plane owner - Hypothesis scorecard against deprecation plan for a model still in a batch job: supported / rejected / untestable - Owner and next date for enterprise AI control-plane owner in a firm whose vendor MSA is silent on training rights - What changes vendor terms allow customer if a committee that has not met since the last incident is later withdrawn