Assess whether a shadow system must be decommissioned this quarter (bf2e7b)

Situation

Inventory and Regulatory Fit work in a university licensing an AI proctoring vendor now turns on a shadow system must because a DPA inquiry about training on European user data put EU AI Act high-risk classification worksheet in play. EU AI Act implementation manager should say what EU AI Act high-risk classification worksheet proves.

Decision

EU AI Act implementation manager in a university licensing an AI proctoring vendor must choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact using EU AI Act high-risk classification worksheet after a DPA inquiry about training on European user data.

Hypotheses to test

• EU AI Act high-risk classification worksheet reads as Policy or governance breach once a DPA inquiry about training on European user data is lined up to the same AI Governance population.
• EU AI Act high-risk classification worksheet is closer to Model defect after a DPA inquiry about training on European user data; Policy or governance breach would over-claim this Inventory and Regulatory Fit extract.
• Dual failure is still live in EU AI Act high-risk classification worksheet for EU AI Act implementation manager in a university licensing an AI proctoring vendor.
• EU AI Act high-risk classification worksheet is missing the fact EU AI Act implementation manager needs after a DPA inquiry about training on European user data; stop this AI Governance close.

Analysis required

• Verify data provenance and the human-oversight gate EU AI Act implementation manager can actually point to.
• Walk the model input/output path recorded in EU AI Act high-risk classification worksheet and mark each hop approved, shadow, or unlogged.
• Verify data provenance and the human-oversight gate EU AI Act implementation manager can actually point to.
• For this AI Governance Inventory and Regulatory Fit file, read EU AI Act high-risk classification worksheet against a DPA inquiry about training on European user data and write the one fact that would move a shadow system must for EU AI Act implementation manager.

Recommendation

Choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact on this AI Governance / Inventory and Regulatory Fit packet (EU AI Act high-risk classification worksheet after a DPA inquiry about training on European user data). Lead with the AI Governance option EU AI Act high-risk classification worksheet can support after a DPA inquiry about training on European user data, then the two facts that force it, then the Monday action for EU AI Act implementation manager in a university licensing an AI proctoring vendor.

Command returns

• Bottom-line AI Governance option on a shadow system must, then the evidence in EU AI Act high-risk classification worksheet, then the action for EU AI Act implementation manager
• Hypothesis scorecard against EU AI Act high-risk classification worksheet: supported / rejected / untestable
• Regulatory or exam hook Inventory and Regulatory Fit would cite
• Inventory and Regulatory Fit finding in EU AI Act high-risk classification worksheet that a second reviewer can re-perform