Assess whether a shadow system must be decommissioned this quarter (d5c13c)

Situation

A business unit that already went live without a risk tier put post-deployment drift report the owner never signed in front of EU AI Act implementation manager in an insurer scoring claims with a third-party model. This AI Governance / Policy and Oversight close is a shadow system must from post-deployment drift report the owner never signed, and the live options are Policy or governance breach, Model defect, Dual failure.

Decision

EU AI Act implementation manager in an insurer scoring claims with a third-party model must choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact using post-deployment drift report the owner never signed after a business unit that already went live without a risk tier.

Hypotheses to test

• Post-deployment drift report the owner never signed reads as Policy or governance breach once a business unit that already went live without a risk tier is lined up to the same AI Governance population.
• Post-deployment drift report the owner never signed is closer to Model defect after a business unit that already went live without a risk tier; Policy or governance breach would over-claim this Policy and Oversight extract.
• Dual failure is still live in post-deployment drift report the owner never signed for EU AI Act implementation manager in an insurer scoring claims with a third-party model.
• Post-deployment drift report the owner never signed is missing the fact EU AI Act implementation manager needs after a business unit that already went live without a risk tier; stop this AI Governance close.

Analysis required

• Verify data provenance and the human-oversight gate EU AI Act implementation manager can actually point to.
• Walk the model input/output path recorded in post-deployment drift report the owner never signed and mark each hop approved, shadow, or unlogged.
• Verify data provenance and the human-oversight gate EU AI Act implementation manager can actually point to.
• For this AI Governance Policy and Oversight file, read post-deployment drift report the owner never signed against a business unit that already went live without a risk tier and write the one fact that would move a shadow system must for EU AI Act implementation manager.

Recommendation

Choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact on this AI Governance / Policy and Oversight packet (post-deployment drift report the owner never signed after a business unit that already went live without a risk tier). If post-deployment drift report the owner never signed cannot force a AI Governance label under Policy and Oversight, stop. If post-deployment drift report the owner never signed after a business unit that already went live without a risk tier cannot support Policy or governance breach versus Model defect on this AI Governance Policy and Oversight close, EU AI Act implementation manager must leave the classification unresolved and name the missing control or provenance fact.

Command returns

• Bottom-line AI Governance option on a shadow system must, then the evidence in post-deployment drift report the owner never signed, then the action for EU AI Act implementation manager
• Hypothesis scorecard against post-deployment drift report the owner never signed: supported / rejected / untestable
• Missing page in post-deployment drift report the owner never signed after a business unit that already went live without a risk tier, if any
• Regulatory or exam hook Policy and Oversight would cite