Assess whether a shadow system must be decommissioned this quarter (66208b)

Situation

In a university licensing an AI proctoring vendor, shadow-IT chatbot connected to customer PII is the evidence after an examiner request for the current model inventory. EU AI Act implementation manager has to pick Policy or governance breach or Model defect for this AI Governance Inventory and Regulatory Fit close using shadow-IT chatbot connected to customer PII.

Decision

EU AI Act implementation manager in a university licensing an AI proctoring vendor must choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact using shadow-IT chatbot connected to customer PII after an examiner request for the current model inventory.

Hypotheses to test

• EU AI Act implementation manager can defend Policy or governance breach from shadow-IT chatbot connected to customer PII after an examiner request for the current model inventory in a AI Governance challenge.
• EU AI Act implementation manager cannot defend Policy or governance breach from shadow-IT chatbot connected to customer PII; Model defect is what the extract actually supports after an examiner request for the current model inventory.
• An examiner request for the current model inventory never reached the population in shadow-IT chatbot connected to customer PII — reopen intake, do not close a shadow system must.
• Two facts in shadow-IT chatbot connected to customer PII after an examiner request for the current model inventory conflict for EU AI Act implementation manager; hold this Inventory and Regulatory Fit file.

Analysis required

• Walk the model input/output path recorded in shadow-IT chatbot connected to customer PII and mark each hop approved, shadow, or unlogged.
• Verify data provenance and the human-oversight gate EU AI Act implementation manager can actually point to.
• Walk the model input/output path recorded in shadow-IT chatbot connected to customer PII and mark each hop approved, shadow, or unlogged.
• For this AI Governance Inventory and Regulatory Fit file, read shadow-IT chatbot connected to customer PII against an examiner request for the current model inventory and write the one fact that would move a shadow system must for EU AI Act implementation manager.

Recommendation

Choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact on this AI Governance / Inventory and Regulatory Fit packet (shadow-IT chatbot connected to customer PII after an examiner request for the current model inventory). Lead with the AI Governance option shadow-IT chatbot connected to customer PII can support after an examiner request for the current model inventory, then the two facts that force it, then the Monday action for EU AI Act implementation manager in a university licensing an AI proctoring vendor.

Command returns

• Bottom-line AI Governance option on a shadow system must, then the evidence in shadow-IT chatbot connected to customer PII, then the action for EU AI Act implementation manager
• Hypothesis scorecard against shadow-IT chatbot connected to customer PII: supported / rejected / untestable
• Inventory and Regulatory Fit finding in shadow-IT chatbot connected to customer PII that a second reviewer can re-perform
• Missing page in shadow-IT chatbot connected to customer PII after an examiner request for the current model inventory, if any