Assess whether explainability artifacts would survive an exam (2d6b0e)

Situation

Vendor model card with missing evaluation slices arrived with a board deck that called the system 'fully explainable' for exam-readiness coordinator. That is a AI Governance Policy and Oversight decision on explainability artifacts would survive in a hospital deploying a sepsis-risk model.

Decision

Exam-readiness coordinator in a hospital deploying a sepsis-risk model must choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact using vendor model card with missing evaluation slices after a board deck that called the system 'fully explainable'.

Hypotheses to test

• Authorize Policy or governance breach now; vendor model card with missing evaluation slices already has the discriminator after a board deck that called the system 'fully explainable'.
• Keep Model defect in force until vendor model card with missing evaluation slices is completed after a board deck that called the system 'fully explainable' for exam-readiness coordinator.
• Treat vendor model card with missing evaluation slices as Dual failure because both readings appear after a board deck that called the system 'fully explainable'.
• Refuse a AI Governance close: exam-readiness coordinator does not have the page explainability artifacts would survive turns on in vendor model card with missing evaluation slices.

Analysis required

• Split policy-or-governance failure from a model defect using prompts, outputs, and human edits in vendor model card with missing evaluation slices.
• Reproduce the incident row in vendor model card with missing evaluation slices and say whether it ever touched production data.
• Split policy-or-governance failure from a model defect using prompts, outputs, and human edits in vendor model card with missing evaluation slices.
• For this AI Governance Policy and Oversight file, read vendor model card with missing evaluation slices against a board deck that called the system 'fully explainable' and write the one fact that would move explainability artifacts would survive for exam-readiness coordinator.

Recommendation

Choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact on this AI Governance / Policy and Oversight packet (vendor model card with missing evaluation slices after a board deck that called the system 'fully explainable'). If vendor model card with missing evaluation slices cannot force a AI Governance label under Policy and Oversight, stop. Do not invent pages a hospital deploying a sepsis-risk model does not have.

Command returns

• Bottom-line AI Governance option on explainability artifacts would survive, then the evidence in vendor model card with missing evaluation slices, then the action for exam-readiness coordinator
• Hypothesis scorecard against vendor model card with missing evaluation slices: supported / rejected / untestable
• Owner and next date for exam-readiness coordinator in a hospital deploying a sepsis-risk model
• What changes explainability artifacts would survive if a board deck that called the system 'fully explainable' is later withdrawn