Assess whether the MRO interview was complete enough to verify (96c66d)

SITUATION A fatal CMV crash with a pending test put hair-test admissibility file for a non-DOT decision in front of medical review officer in a company transitioning to oral fluid. This Forensic Drug Testing / Program Design and Audit decision is the MRO interview was from hair-test admissibility file for a non-DOT decision, and the live options are Accept the result, Reject on custody, Recollect.

DECISION Medical review officer in a company transitioning to oral fluid must choose Accept the result / Reject on custody / Recollect / Hold using hair-test admissibility file for a non-DOT decision after a fatal CMV crash with a pending test.

HYPOTHESES TO TEST 1. Medical review officer can defend Accept the result from hair-test admissibility file for a non-DOT decision after a fatal CMV crash with a pending test in a Forensic Drug Testing challenge. 2. Medical review officer cannot defend Accept the result from hair-test admissibility file for a non-DOT decision; Reject on custody is what the extract actually supports after a fatal CMV crash with a pending test. 3. A fatal CMV crash with a pending test never reached the population in hair-test admissibility file for a non-DOT decision — reopen intake, do not close the MRO interview was. 4. Two facts in hair-test admissibility file for a non-DOT decision after a fatal CMV crash with a pending test conflict for medical review officer; hold this Program Design and Audit file.

ANALYSIS REQUIRED 1. Confirm the kit ID in hair-test admissibility file for a non-DOT decision matches the collection log. 2. Check MRO notes and cutoffs against the protocol a company transitioning to oral fluid claims to run. 3. Walk chain of custody, collection site, and validity flags in hair-test admissibility file for a non-DOT decision after a fatal CMV crash with a pending test. 4. For this Forensic Drug Testing Program Design and Audit file, read hair-test admissibility file for a non-DOT decision against a fatal CMV crash with a pending test and write the one fact that would move the MRO interview was for medical review officer.

RECOMMENDATION Choose Accept the result / Reject on custody / Recollect / Hold on this Forensic Drug Testing / Program Design and Audit packet (hair-test admissibility file for a non-DOT decision after a fatal CMV crash with a pending test). The follow-on Program Design and Audit action is what medical review officer does next: implement the option, assign an owner, and log the missing fact.

COMMAND RETURNS - Bottom-line Forensic Drug Testing option on the MRO interview was, then the evidence in hair-test admissibility file for a non-DOT decision, then the action for medical review officer - Hypothesis scorecard against hair-test admissibility file for a non-DOT decision: supported / rejected / untestable - Owner and next date for medical review officer in a company transitioning to oral fluid - What changes the MRO interview was if a fatal CMV crash with a pending test is later withdrawn