Assess whether the committee can overrule a business unit (2ae5df)

SITUATION A vendor that changed subprocessors without notice put vendor MSA clauses on training, indemnity, and subprocessors in front of model-deprecation manager in a bank running three models on the same credit file. This AI Governance Layer / Lifecycle and Accountability decision is the committee can overrule from vendor MSA clauses on training, indemnity, and subprocessors, and the live options are Policy or governance breach, Model defect, Dual failure.

DECISION Model-deprecation manager in a bank running three models on the same credit file must choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact using vendor MSA clauses on training, indemnity, and subprocessors after a vendor that changed subprocessors without notice.

HYPOTHESES TO TEST 1. Authorize Policy or governance breach now; vendor MSA clauses on training, indemnity, and subprocessors already has the discriminator after a vendor that changed subprocessors without notice. 2. Keep Model defect in force until vendor MSA clauses on training, indemnity, and subprocessors is completed after a vendor that changed subprocessors without notice for model-deprecation manager. 3. Treat vendor MSA clauses on training, indemnity, and subprocessors as Dual failure because both readings appear after a vendor that changed subprocessors without notice. 4. Refuse a AI Governance Layer close: model-deprecation manager does not have the decision the committee can overrule turns on in vendor MSA clauses on training, indemnity, and subprocessors.

ANALYSIS REQUIRED 1. Map the control-plane score in vendor MSA clauses on training, indemnity, and subprocessors to the policy gate model-deprecation manager can enforce. 2. Name the override that would let the committee can overrule proceed without a silent bypass. 3. Test whether a vendor that changed subprocessors without notice changed routing, logging, or human-in-the-loop on the live agent path. 4. For this AI Governance Layer Lifecycle and Accountability file, read vendor MSA clauses on training, indemnity, and subprocessors against a vendor that changed subprocessors without notice and write the one fact that would move the committee can overrule for model-deprecation manager.

RECOMMENDATION Choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact on this AI Governance Layer / Lifecycle and Accountability packet (vendor MSA clauses on training, indemnity, and subprocessors after a vendor that changed subprocessors without notice). If vendor MSA clauses on training, indemnity, and subprocessors cannot force a AI Governance Layer label under Lifecycle and Accountability, stop. If vendor MSA clauses on training, indemnity, and subprocessors after a vendor that changed subprocessors without notice cannot support Policy or governance breach versus Model defect on this AI Governance Layer Lifecycle and Accountability close, model-deprecation manager must leave the classification unresolved and name the missing control or provenance fact.