Assess whether comparative files show second-review bias (9b4ce7)
August 31, 2026 · SmartSolo
Situation
After a vendor score change with no disparate-impact test, mortgage pricing residual by prohibited-basis group is what second-review underwriter can touch in a lender expanding into majority-minority census tracts. Fair Lending will live with Remove access or reverse the item versus Temporary compensating control on this CRA and Special-Purpose Programs file.
Decision
Second-review underwriter in a lender expanding into majority-minority census tracts must choose Remove access or reverse the item / Temporary compensating control / Approve a documented exception / Hold using mortgage pricing residual by prohibited-basis group after a vendor score change with no disparate-impact test.
Hypotheses to test
- The population in mortgage pricing residual by prohibited-basis group is the one a vendor score change with no disparate-impact test named, so Remove access or reverse the item follows for this CRA and Special-Purpose Programs file.
- The population in mortgage pricing residual by prohibited-basis group is adjacent only to a vendor score change with no disparate-impact test; Temporary compensating control is the honest Fair Lending call.
- A lender expanding into majority-minority census tracts already contained a vendor score change with no disparate-impact test before mortgage pricing residual by prohibited-basis group arrived; no new CRA and Special-Purpose Programs path.
- Provenance on mortgage pricing residual by prohibited-basis group after a vendor score change with no disparate-impact test is broken; do not pick Remove access or reverse the item or Temporary compensating control yet.
Analysis required
- Test a documented exception versus a pattern a lender expanding into majority-minority census tracts must defend.
- Match the adverse-action language to the facts in mortgage pricing residual by prohibited-basis group.
- Check HMDA coding and underwriting policy against comparative files show second-review.
- For this Fair Lending CRA and Special-Purpose Programs file, read mortgage pricing residual by prohibited-basis group against a vendor score change with no disparate-impact test and write the one fact that would move comparative files show second-review for second-review underwriter.
Recommendation
Explore more
More Fair Lending prompts
- Assess whether dealer overlays introduce prohibited steering (d754ec)
- Assess whether comparative files show second-review bias (a5c18f)
- Assess whether pricing disparities are justified by legitimate factors
- Assess whether line assignments have a disparate impact the bank will defend
- Assess whether HMDA data can be relied on for the exam (aef69e)
Explore related decision areas
- Assess whether occupancy was misrepresented at origination (066102)Fraud Detection
- Determine wire Transfer Fraud — Business Email Compromise AI Decision PlaybookFraud Detection
- Assess whether the treaty is adequate or needs a cut (751621)Insurance Underwriting
See governed multi-model AI on your own prompt
Compare GPT-5, Claude, and Gemini side by side, with human review and a decision record built in.

