Assess whether audits can reconstruct who authorized what (56d70f)

Situation

After a vendor that changed subprocessors without notice, content-attribution tags missing on customer-facing copy is what multi-model reconciliation lead can touch in a regulated entity that cannot reconstruct last month's decisions. AI Governance Layer will live with Policy or governance breach versus Model defect on this Lifecycle and Accountability file.

Decision

Multi-model reconciliation lead in a regulated entity that cannot reconstruct last month's decisions must choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact using content-attribution tags missing on customer-facing copy after a vendor that changed subprocessors without notice.

Hypotheses to test

• Authorize Policy or governance breach now; content-attribution tags missing on customer-facing copy already has the discriminator after a vendor that changed subprocessors without notice.
• Keep Model defect in force until content-attribution tags missing on customer-facing copy is completed after a vendor that changed subprocessors without notice for multi-model reconciliation lead.
• Treat content-attribution tags missing on customer-facing copy as Dual failure because both readings appear after a vendor that changed subprocessors without notice.
• Refuse a AI Governance Layer close: multi-model reconciliation lead does not have the page audits can reconstruct who turns on in content-attribution tags missing on customer-facing copy.

Analysis required

• Name the override that would let audits can reconstruct who proceed without a silent bypass.
• Test whether a vendor that changed subprocessors without notice changed routing, logging, or human-in-the-loop on the live agent path.
• Score whether the agent action in content-attribution tags missing on customer-facing copy was in-policy, out-of-policy, or unlogged.
• For this AI Governance Layer Lifecycle and Accountability file, read content-attribution tags missing on customer-facing copy against a vendor that changed subprocessors without notice and write the one fact that would move audits can reconstruct who for multi-model reconciliation lead.

Recommendation

Choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact on this AI Governance Layer / Lifecycle and Accountability packet (content-attribution tags missing on customer-facing copy after a vendor that changed subprocessors without notice). Lead with the AI Governance Layer option content-attribution tags missing on customer-facing copy can support after a vendor that changed subprocessors without notice, then the two facts that force it, then the Monday action for multi-model reconciliation lead in a regulated entity that cannot reconstruct last month's decisions.

Command returns

• Bottom-line AI Governance Layer option on audits can reconstruct who, then the evidence in content-attribution tags missing on customer-facing copy, then the action for multi-model reconciliation lead
• Hypothesis scorecard against content-attribution tags missing on customer-facing copy: supported / rejected / untestable
• Named option among Policy or governance breach, Model defect, Dual failure and the fact that kills the others
• Owner and next date for multi-model reconciliation lead in a regulated entity that cannot reconstruct last month's decisions