Assess whether the committee can overrule a business unit (00f1c5)

SITUATION After an examiner asking who authorized last Tuesday's model output, reconciliation policy when two models split on materiality is what multi-model reconciliation lead can touch in a regulated entity that cannot reconstruct last month's decisions. AI Governance Layer will live with Policy or governance breach versus Model defect on this Lifecycle and Accountability file.

DECISION Multi-model reconciliation lead in a regulated entity that cannot reconstruct last month's decisions must choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact using reconciliation policy when two models split on materiality after an examiner asking who authorized last Tuesday's model output.

HYPOTHESES TO TEST 1. Reconciliation policy when two models split on materiality reads as Policy or governance breach once an examiner asking who authorized last Tuesday's model output is lined up to the same AI Governance Layer population. 2. Reconciliation policy when two models split on materiality is closer to Model defect after an examiner asking who authorized last Tuesday's model output; Policy or governance breach would over-claim this Lifecycle and Accountability extract. 3. Dual failure is still live in reconciliation policy when two models split on materiality for multi-model reconciliation lead in a regulated entity that cannot reconstruct last month's decisions. 4. Reconciliation policy when two models split on materiality is missing the fact multi-model reconciliation lead needs after an examiner asking who authorized last Tuesday's model output; stop this AI Governance Layer close.

ANALYSIS REQUIRED 1. Name the override that would let the committee can overrule proceed without a silent bypass. 2. Test whether an examiner asking who authorized last Tuesday's model output changed routing, logging, or human-in-the-loop on the live agent path. 3. Score whether the agent action in reconciliation policy when two models split on materiality was in-policy, out-of-policy, or unlogged. 4. For this AI Governance Layer Lifecycle and Accountability file, read reconciliation policy when two models split on materiality against an examiner asking who authorized last Tuesday's model output and write the one fact that would move the committee can overrule for multi-model reconciliation lead.

RECOMMENDATION Choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact on this AI Governance Layer / Lifecycle and Accountability packet (reconciliation policy when two models split on materiality after an examiner asking who authorized last Tuesday's model output). Lead with the AI Governance Layer option reconciliation policy when two models split on materiality can support after an examiner asking who authorized last Tuesday's model output, then the two facts that force it, then the Monday action for multi-model reconciliation lead in a regulated entity that cannot reconstruct last month's decisions.