Assess whether procurement should fail a vendor lacking eval rights (c49b97)

SITUATION Two production models recommending opposite actions on the same file put reconciliation policy when two models split on materiality in front of multi-model reconciliation lead in a regulated entity that cannot reconstruct last month's decisions. This AI Governance Layer / Lifecycle and Accountability close is procurement should fail a from reconciliation policy when two models split on materiality, and the live options are Policy or governance breach, Model defect, Dual failure.

DECISION Multi-model reconciliation lead in a regulated entity that cannot reconstruct last month's decisions must choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact using reconciliation policy when two models split on materiality after two production models recommending opposite actions on the same file.

HYPOTHESES TO TEST 1. Reconciliation policy when two models split on materiality reads as Policy or governance breach once two production models recommending opposite actions on the same file is lined up to the same AI Governance Layer population. 2. Reconciliation policy when two models split on materiality is closer to Model defect after two production models recommending opposite actions on the same file; Policy or governance breach would over-claim this Lifecycle and Accountability extract. 3. Dual failure is still live in reconciliation policy when two models split on materiality for multi-model reconciliation lead in a regulated entity that cannot reconstruct last month's decisions. 4. Reconciliation policy when two models split on materiality is missing the fact multi-model reconciliation lead needs after two production models recommending opposite actions on the same file; stop this AI Governance Layer close.

ANALYSIS REQUIRED 1. Score whether the agent action in reconciliation policy when two models split on materiality was in-policy, out-of-policy, or unlogged. 2. Confirm the inventory line still matches the running configuration in a regulated entity that cannot reconstruct last month's decisions. 3. Map the control-plane score in reconciliation policy when two models split on materiality to the policy gate multi-model reconciliation lead can enforce. 4. For this AI Governance Layer Lifecycle and Accountability file, read reconciliation policy when two models split on materiality against two production models recommending opposite actions on the same file and write the one fact that would move procurement should fail a for multi-model reconciliation lead.

RECOMMENDATION Choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact on this AI Governance Layer / Lifecycle and Accountability packet (reconciliation policy when two models split on materiality after two production models recommending opposite actions on the same file). Lead with the AI Governance Layer option reconciliation policy when two models split on materiality can support after two production models recommending opposite actions on the same file, then the two facts that force it, then the Monday action for multi-model reconciliation lead in a regulated entity that cannot reconstruct last month's decisions.