Whether comparative files show discrimination the bank must own from RFP

Situation

After an OCC request for model validation of a fair-lending control, RFP Section L/M that omits a mandatory clause is what OFAC sanctions investigator can touch in an IG shop scoping a whistleblower allegation. US Federal will live with Pursue versus Pursue with conditions on this Procurement Contracting file.

Decision

OFAC sanctions investigator in an IG shop scoping a whistleblower allegation must choose Pursue / Pursue with conditions / Partner / No-bid using RFP Section L/M that omits a mandatory clause after an OCC request for model validation of a fair-lending control.

Hypotheses to test

• An OCC request for model validation of a fair-lending control is noise around an already-controlled Procurement Contracting process in an IG shop scoping a whistleblower allegation, given RFP Section L/M that omits a mandatory clause.
• An OCC request for model validation of a fair-lending control is the event in RFP Section L/M that omits a mandatory clause that forces Pursue for OFAC sanctions investigator under US Federal.
• RFP Section L/M that omits a mandatory clause shows a one-file miss after an OCC request for model validation of a fair-lending control, not a Procurement Contracting program failure.
• RFP Section L/M that omits a mandatory clause cannot decide comparative files show discrimination yet after an OCC request for model validation of a fair-lending control; hold is the only US Federal close an IG shop scoping a whistleblower allegation can defend.

Analysis required

• Map FAR, Section L/M, and evaluator priorities in RFP Section L/M that omits a mandatory clause after an OCC request for model validation of a fair-lending control.
• Name the evaluation right OFAC sanctions investigator would forfeit by rushing.
• Normalize pricing and CPARS/QASP evidence that actually supports comparative files show discrimination.
• For this US Federal Procurement Contracting file, read RFP Section L/M that omits a mandatory clause against an OCC request for model validation of a fair-lending control and write the one fact that would move comparative files show discrimination for OFAC sanctions investigator.

Recommendation

Choose Pursue / Pursue with conditions / Partner / No-bid on this US Federal / Procurement Contracting packet (RFP Section L/M that omits a mandatory clause after an OCC request for model validation of a fair-lending control). The follow-on Procurement Contracting action is what OFAC sanctions investigator does next: implement the option, assign an owner, and log the missing fact.