Assess whether the site should be suspended from collections (cd69b1)

SITUATION Oral-fluid implementation lead in a federal contractor under an HHS-mandatory program has one working extract — oral-fluid cutoff and collection-device validation — after a SAP who closed the file before follow-up tests finished. Oral-fluid implementation lead in a federal contractor under an HHS-mandatory program has oral-fluid cutoff and collection-device validation after a SAP who closed the file before follow-up tests finished. If that extract cannot support the site should be suspended, the only defensible Forensic Drug Testing Program Design and Audit output is hold.

DECISION Oral-fluid implementation lead in a federal contractor under an HHS-mandatory program must choose Accept the result / Reject on custody / Recollect / Hold using oral-fluid cutoff and collection-device validation after a SAP who closed the file before follow-up tests finished.

HYPOTHESES TO TEST 1. A SAP who closed the file before follow-up tests finished is noise around an already-controlled Program Design and Audit process in a federal contractor under an HHS-mandatory program, given oral-fluid cutoff and collection-device validation. 2. A SAP who closed the file before follow-up tests finished is the event in oral-fluid cutoff and collection-device validation that forces Accept the result for oral-fluid implementation lead under Forensic Drug Testing. 3. Oral-fluid cutoff and collection-device validation shows a one-file miss after a SAP who closed the file before follow-up tests finished, not a Program Design and Audit program failure. 4. Oral-fluid cutoff and collection-device validation cannot decide the site should be suspended yet after a SAP who closed the file before follow-up tests finished; hold is the only Forensic Drug Testing close a federal contractor under an HHS-mandatory program can defend.

ANALYSIS REQUIRED 1. Check MRO notes and cutoffs against the protocol a federal contractor under an HHS-mandatory program claims to run. 2. Walk chain of custody, collection site, and validity flags in oral-fluid cutoff and collection-device validation after a SAP who closed the file before follow-up tests finished. 3. Name the step oral-fluid implementation lead cannot reconstruct from oral-fluid cutoff and collection-device validation. 4. For this Forensic Drug Testing Program Design and Audit file, read oral-fluid cutoff and collection-device validation against a SAP who closed the file before follow-up tests finished and write the one fact that would move the site should be suspended for oral-fluid implementation lead.

RECOMMENDATION Choose Accept the result / Reject on custody / Recollect / Hold on this Forensic Drug Testing / Program Design and Audit packet (oral-fluid cutoff and collection-device validation after a SAP who closed the file before follow-up tests finished). Lead with the Forensic Drug Testing option oral-fluid cutoff and collection-device validation can support after a SAP who closed the file before follow-up tests finished, then the two facts that force it, then the Monday action for oral-fluid implementation lead in a federal contractor under an HHS-mandatory program.