Assess whether deprecation will strand a downstream process (8daad3)

SITUATION Audit and Vendor Terms work in a manufacturer sunsetting a vision model still used in QA now turns on deprecation will strand a because two production models recommending opposite actions on the same file put output-scoring rubric that never fails a high-risk output in play. AI committee secretariat should say what output-scoring rubric that never fails a high-risk output proves.

DECISION AI committee secretariat in a manufacturer sunsetting a vision model still used in QA must choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact using output-scoring rubric that never fails a high-risk output after two production models recommending opposite actions on the same file.

HYPOTHESES TO TEST 1. Output-scoring rubric that never fails a high-risk output reads as Policy or governance breach once two production models recommending opposite actions on the same file is lined up to the same AI Governance Layer population. 2. Output-scoring rubric that never fails a high-risk output is closer to Model defect after two production models recommending opposite actions on the same file; Policy or governance breach would over-claim this Audit and Vendor Terms extract. 3. Dual failure is still live in output-scoring rubric that never fails a high-risk output for AI committee secretariat in a manufacturer sunsetting a vision model still used in QA. 4. Output-scoring rubric that never fails a high-risk output is missing the fact AI committee secretariat needs after two production models recommending opposite actions on the same file; stop this AI Governance Layer close.

ANALYSIS REQUIRED 1. Score whether the agent action in output-scoring rubric that never fails a high-risk output was in-policy, out-of-policy, or unlogged. 2. Confirm the inventory line still matches the running configuration in a manufacturer sunsetting a vision model still used in QA. 3. Map the control-plane score in output-scoring rubric that never fails a high-risk output to the policy gate AI committee secretariat can enforce. 4. For this AI Governance Layer Audit and Vendor Terms file, read output-scoring rubric that never fails a high-risk output against two production models recommending opposite actions on the same file and write the one fact that would move deprecation will strand a for AI committee secretariat.

RECOMMENDATION Choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact on this AI Governance Layer / Audit and Vendor Terms packet (output-scoring rubric that never fails a high-risk output after two production models recommending opposite actions on the same file). If output-scoring rubric that never fails a high-risk output cannot force a AI Governance Layer label under Audit and Vendor Terms, stop. If output-scoring rubric that never fails a high-risk output after two production models recommending opposite actions on the same file cannot support Policy or governance breach versus Model defect on this AI Governance Layer Audit and Vendor Terms close, AI committee secretariat must leave the classification unresolved and name the missing control or provenance fact.