Assess whether monitoring detects drift or only outages (cc3a82)

SITUATION A regulated entity that cannot reconstruct last month's decisions cannot treat a scorecard that rated 100% of outputs 'acceptable' as incidental context on output-scoring rubric that never fails a high-risk output. Vendor-contract AI counsel's operations partner must close monitoring detects drift or from that extract under AI Governance Layer / Audit and Vendor Terms.

DECISION Vendor-contract AI counsel's operations partner in a regulated entity that cannot reconstruct last month's decisions must choose Monitoring detects drift / Only outages using output-scoring rubric that never fails a high-risk output after a scorecard that rated 100% of outputs 'acceptable'.

HYPOTHESES TO TEST 1. Output-scoring rubric that never fails a high-risk output reads as Monitoring detects drift once a scorecard that rated 100% of outputs 'acceptable' is lined up to the same AI Governance Layer population. 2. Output-scoring rubric that never fails a high-risk output is closer to Only outages after a scorecard that rated 100% of outputs 'acceptable'; Monitoring detects drift would over-claim this Audit and Vendor Terms extract. 3. A dual reading is still live in output-scoring rubric that never fails a high-risk output for vendor-contract AI counsel's operations partner in a regulated entity that cannot reconstruct last month's decisions. 4. Output-scoring rubric that never fails a high-risk output is missing the fact vendor-contract AI counsel's operations partner needs after a scorecard that rated 100% of outputs 'acceptable'; stop this AI Governance Layer close.

ANALYSIS REQUIRED 1. Test whether a scorecard that rated 100% of outputs 'acceptable' changed routing, logging, or human-in-the-loop on the live agent path. 2. Score whether the agent action in output-scoring rubric that never fails a high-risk output was in-policy, out-of-policy, or unlogged. 3. Confirm the inventory line still matches the running configuration in a regulated entity that cannot reconstruct last month's decisions. 4. For this AI Governance Layer Audit and Vendor Terms file, read output-scoring rubric that never fails a high-risk output against a scorecard that rated 100% of outputs 'acceptable' and write the one fact that would move monitoring detects drift or for vendor-contract AI counsel's operations partner.

RECOMMENDATION Choose Monitoring detects drift / Only outages on this AI Governance Layer / Audit and Vendor Terms packet (output-scoring rubric that never fails a high-risk output after a scorecard that rated 100% of outputs 'acceptable'). The follow-on Audit and Vendor Terms action is what vendor-contract AI counsel's operations partner does next: implement the option, assign an owner, and log the missing fact.