Assess whether past performance will score or be deemed not relevant (5ed3b9)

Situation

Past-performance recency and relevance scorecard arrived with a debrief that contradicts the evaluation-notice scores for capture manager. That is a Government RFP Performance and Teaming decision on past performance will score in an incumbent defending a recompete with thin past performance.

Decision

Capture manager in an incumbent defending a recompete with thin past performance must choose Past performance will score / Be deemed not relevant using past-performance recency and relevance scorecard after a debrief that contradicts the evaluation-notice scores.

Hypotheses to test

• The population in past-performance recency and relevance scorecard is the one a debrief that contradicts the evaluation-notice scores named, so Past performance will score follows for this Performance and Teaming file.
• The population in past-performance recency and relevance scorecard is adjacent only to a debrief that contradicts the evaluation-notice scores; Be deemed not relevant is the honest Government RFP call.
• An incumbent defending a recompete with thin past performance already contained a debrief that contradicts the evaluation-notice scores before past-performance recency and relevance scorecard arrived; no new Performance and Teaming path.
• Provenance on past-performance recency and relevance scorecard after a debrief that contradicts the evaluation-notice scores is broken; do not pick Past performance will score or Be deemed not relevant yet.

Analysis required

• Normalize pricing and exceptions against the solicitation that governs past performance will score.
• Score competitive posture if capture manager pursues, partners, or no-bids.
• Test OCI, QASP, and mandatory evaluation rights an incumbent defending a recompete with thin past performance cannot waive quietly.
• For this Government RFP Performance and Teaming file, read past-performance recency and relevance scorecard against a debrief that contradicts the evaluation-notice scores and write the one fact that would move past performance will score for capture manager.

Recommendation

Choose Past performance will score / Be deemed not relevant on this Government RFP / Performance and Teaming packet (past-performance recency and relevance scorecard after a debrief that contradicts the evaluation-notice scores). Lead with the Government RFP option past-performance recency and relevance scorecard can support after a debrief that contradicts the evaluation-notice scores, then the two facts that force it, then the Monday action for capture manager in an incumbent defending a recompete with thin past performance.