Assess whether claimed differentiators would survive a fact check (9113ba)

SITUATION In a lab competing a Phase II SBIR, shall-statement compliance matrix with gaps is the evidence after a teammate that cannot meet the facility-clearance requirement. Past-performance volume owner has to pick Pursue or Pursue with conditions for this Government RFP Compliance and Cyber Requirements close using shall-statement compliance matrix with gaps.

DECISION Past-performance volume owner in a lab competing a Phase II SBIR must choose Pursue / Pursue with conditions / Partner / No-bid using shall-statement compliance matrix with gaps after a teammate that cannot meet the facility-clearance requirement.

HYPOTHESES TO TEST 1. The population in shall-statement compliance matrix with gaps is the one a teammate that cannot meet the facility-clearance requirement named, so Pursue follows for this Compliance and Cyber Requirements file. 2. The population in shall-statement compliance matrix with gaps is adjacent only to a teammate that cannot meet the facility-clearance requirement; Pursue with conditions is the honest Government RFP call. 3. A lab competing a Phase II SBIR already contained a teammate that cannot meet the facility-clearance requirement before shall-statement compliance matrix with gaps arrived; no new Compliance and Cyber Requirements path. 4. Provenance on shall-statement compliance matrix with gaps after a teammate that cannot meet the facility-clearance requirement is broken; do not pick Pursue or Pursue with conditions yet.

ANALYSIS REQUIRED 1. Map Section L/M requirements in shall-statement compliance matrix with gaps to evaluator notes after a teammate that cannot meet the facility-clearance requirement. 2. Compare teaming and past-performance claims to what shall-statement compliance matrix with gaps attaches. 3. Normalize pricing and exceptions against the solicitation that governs claimed differentiators would survive. 4. For this Government RFP Compliance and Cyber Requirements file, read shall-statement compliance matrix with gaps against a teammate that cannot meet the facility-clearance requirement and write the one fact that would move claimed differentiators would survive for past-performance volume owner.

RECOMMENDATION Choose Pursue / Pursue with conditions / Partner / No-bid on this Government RFP / Compliance and Cyber Requirements packet (shall-statement compliance matrix with gaps after a teammate that cannot meet the facility-clearance requirement). The follow-on Compliance and Cyber Requirements action is what past-performance volume owner does next: implement the option, assign an owner, and log the missing fact.

COMMAND RETURNS - Bottom-line Government RFP option on claimed differentiators would survive, then the evidence in shall-statement compliance matrix with gaps, then the action for past-performance volume owner - Hypothesis scorecard against shall-statement compliance matrix with gaps: supported / rejected / untestable - What changes claimed differentiators would survive if a teammate that cannot meet the facility-clearance requirement is later withdrawn - Named option among Pursue, Pursue with conditions, Partner and the fact that kills the others