Assess whether the SBIR data-rights assertions are too aggressive (3f25fa)

SITUATION Shall-statement compliance matrix with gaps arrived with a data-rights assertion the customer already rejected last year for past-performance volume owner. That is a Government RFP Compliance and Cyber Requirements decision on the SBIR data-rights assertions in a lab competing a Phase II SBIR.

DECISION Past-performance volume owner in a lab competing a Phase II SBIR must choose Pursue / Pursue with conditions / Partner / No-bid using shall-statement compliance matrix with gaps after a data-rights assertion the customer already rejected last year.

HYPOTHESES TO TEST 1. Shall-statement compliance matrix with gaps reads as Pursue once a data-rights assertion the customer already rejected last year is lined up to the same Government RFP population. 2. Shall-statement compliance matrix with gaps is closer to Pursue with conditions after a data-rights assertion the customer already rejected last year; Pursue would over-claim this Compliance and Cyber Requirements extract. 3. Partner is still live in shall-statement compliance matrix with gaps for past-performance volume owner in a lab competing a Phase II SBIR. 4. Shall-statement compliance matrix with gaps is missing the fact past-performance volume owner needs after a data-rights assertion the customer already rejected last year; stop this Government RFP close.

ANALYSIS REQUIRED 1. Normalize pricing and exceptions against the solicitation that governs the SBIR data-rights assertions. 2. Score competitive posture if past-performance volume owner pursues, partners, or no-bids. 3. Test OCI, QASP, and mandatory evaluation rights a lab competing a Phase II SBIR cannot waive quietly. 4. For this Government RFP Compliance and Cyber Requirements file, read shall-statement compliance matrix with gaps against a data-rights assertion the customer already rejected last year and write the one fact that would move the SBIR data-rights assertions for past-performance volume owner.

RECOMMENDATION Choose Pursue / Pursue with conditions / Partner / No-bid on this Government RFP / Compliance and Cyber Requirements packet (shall-statement compliance matrix with gaps after a data-rights assertion the customer already rejected last year). If shall-statement compliance matrix with gaps cannot force a Government RFP label under Compliance and Cyber Requirements, stop. Do not invent missing evidence a lab competing a Phase II SBIR does not have.

COMMAND RETURNS - Bottom-line Government RFP option on the SBIR data-rights assertions, then the evidence in shall-statement compliance matrix with gaps, then the action for past-performance volume owner - Hypothesis scorecard against shall-statement compliance matrix with gaps: supported / rejected / untestable - Named option among Pursue, Pursue with conditions, Partner and the fact that kills the others - Owner and next date for past-performance volume owner in a lab competing a Phase II SBIR