Assess whether an agent may take actions without a human gate (bb819c)

Situation

After a near-miss where an agent emailed a customer unreviewed, post-deployment drift report the owner never signed is what exam-readiness coordinator can touch in a university licensing an AI proctoring vendor. AI Governance will live with Policy or governance breach versus Model defect on this Vendors and Agentic Systems file.

Decision

Exam-readiness coordinator in a university licensing an AI proctoring vendor must choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact using post-deployment drift report the owner never signed after a near-miss where an agent emailed a customer unreviewed.

Hypotheses to test

• The population in post-deployment drift report the owner never signed is the one a near-miss where an agent emailed a customer unreviewed named, so Policy or governance breach follows for this Vendors and Agentic Systems file.
• The population in post-deployment drift report the owner never signed is adjacent only to a near-miss where an agent emailed a customer unreviewed; Model defect is the honest AI Governance call.
• A university licensing an AI proctoring vendor already contained a near-miss where an agent emailed a customer unreviewed before post-deployment drift report the owner never signed arrived; no new Vendors and Agentic Systems path.
• Provenance on post-deployment drift report the owner never signed after a near-miss where an agent emailed a customer unreviewed is broken; do not pick Policy or governance breach or Model defect yet.

Analysis required

• Reproduce the incident row in post-deployment drift report the owner never signed and say whether it ever touched production data.
• Split policy-or-governance failure from a model defect using prompts, outputs, and human edits in post-deployment drift report the owner never signed.
• Reproduce the incident row in post-deployment drift report the owner never signed and say whether it ever touched production data.
• For this AI Governance Vendors and Agentic Systems file, read post-deployment drift report the owner never signed against a near-miss where an agent emailed a customer unreviewed and write the one fact that would move an agent may take for exam-readiness coordinator.

Recommendation

Choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact on this AI Governance / Vendors and Agentic Systems packet (post-deployment drift report the owner never signed after a near-miss where an agent emailed a customer unreviewed). Lead with the AI Governance option post-deployment drift report the owner never signed can support after a near-miss where an agent emailed a customer unreviewed, then the two facts that force it, then the Monday action for exam-readiness coordinator in a university licensing an AI proctoring vendor.

Command returns

• Bottom-line AI Governance option on an agent may take, then the evidence in post-deployment drift report the owner never signed, then the action for exam-readiness coordinator
• Hypothesis scorecard against post-deployment drift report the owner never signed: supported / rejected / untestable
• Named option among Policy or governance breach, Model defect, Dual failure and the fact that kills the others
• Owner and next date for exam-readiness coordinator in a university licensing an AI proctoring vendor