Assess whether agents must have a human gate for external actions (d5ad32)

Situation

The Audit and Vendor Terms desk packet is vendor MSA clauses on training, indemnity, and subprocessors after two production models recommending opposite actions on the same file. Post-deployment monitoring owner in a publisher needing provenance on generated copy must name Policy or governance breach or Model defect for this AI Governance Layer file. Post-deployment monitoring owner in a publisher needing provenance on generated copy has to name Policy or governance breach or Model defect for this AI Governance Layer Audit and Vendor Terms file.

Decision

Post-deployment monitoring owner in a publisher needing provenance on generated copy must choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact using vendor MSA clauses on training, indemnity, and subprocessors after two production models recommending opposite actions on the same file.

Hypotheses to test

• The population in vendor MSA clauses on training, indemnity, and subprocessors is the one two production models recommending opposite actions on the same file named, so Policy or governance breach follows for this Audit and Vendor Terms file.
• The population in vendor MSA clauses on training, indemnity, and subprocessors is adjacent only to two production models recommending opposite actions on the same file; Model defect is the honest AI Governance Layer call.
• A publisher needing provenance on generated copy already contained two production models recommending opposite actions on the same file before vendor MSA clauses on training, indemnity, and subprocessors arrived; no new Audit and Vendor Terms path.
• Provenance on vendor MSA clauses on training, indemnity, and subprocessors after two production models recommending opposite actions on the same file is broken; do not pick Policy or governance breach or Model defect yet.

Analysis required

• Name the override that would let agents must have a human gate proceed without a silent bypass.
• Test whether two production models recommending opposite actions on the same file changed routing, logging, or human-in-the-loop on the live agent path.
• Score whether the agent action in vendor MSA clauses on training, indemnity, and subprocessors was in-policy, out-of-policy, or unlogged.
• For this AI Governance Layer Audit and Vendor Terms file, read vendor MSA clauses on training, indemnity, and subprocessors against two production models recommending opposite actions on the same file and write the one fact that would move agents must have a human gate for post-deployment monitoring owner.