Assess whether the committee can overrule a business unit (e2a1cd)

SITUATION Post-deployment monitoring owner in a publisher needing provenance on generated copy has one working extract — reconciliation policy when two models split on materiality — after a human reviewer who clicked approve in under two seconds. If reconciliation policy when two models split on materiality cannot support the committee can overrule, the only defensible AI Governance Layer output is hold.

DECISION Post-deployment monitoring owner in a publisher needing provenance on generated copy must choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact using reconciliation policy when two models split on materiality after a human reviewer who clicked approve in under two seconds.

HYPOTHESES TO TEST 1. Authorize Policy or governance breach now; reconciliation policy when two models split on materiality already has the discriminator after a human reviewer who clicked approve in under two seconds. 2. Keep Model defect in force until reconciliation policy when two models split on materiality is completed after a human reviewer who clicked approve in under two seconds for post-deployment monitoring owner. 3. Treat reconciliation policy when two models split on materiality as Dual failure because both readings appear after a human reviewer who clicked approve in under two seconds. 4. Refuse a AI Governance Layer close: post-deployment monitoring owner does not have the decision the committee can overrule turns on in reconciliation policy when two models split on materiality.

ANALYSIS REQUIRED 1. Confirm the inventory line still matches the running configuration in a publisher needing provenance on generated copy. 2. Map the control-plane score in reconciliation policy when two models split on materiality to the policy gate post-deployment monitoring owner can enforce. 3. Name the override that would let the committee can overrule proceed without a silent bypass. 4. For this AI Governance Layer Audit and Vendor Terms file, read reconciliation policy when two models split on materiality against a human reviewer who clicked approve in under two seconds and write the one fact that would move the committee can overrule for post-deployment monitoring owner.

RECOMMENDATION Choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact on this AI Governance Layer / Audit and Vendor Terms packet (reconciliation policy when two models split on materiality after a human reviewer who clicked approve in under two seconds). The follow-on Audit and Vendor Terms action is what post-deployment monitoring owner does next: implement the option, assign an owner, and log the missing fact.