Assess whether the SBIR data-rights assertions are too aggressive (bc055b)

SITUATION In a new prime parsing a 400-page Section L/M, a modification adding cybersecurity work not in the PWS put protest-exposure memo on evaluation factors in play. Price-to-win analyst should decide whether the SBIR data-rights assertions are too aggressive without filling gaps protest-exposure memo on evaluation factors does not contain.

DECISION Price-to-win analyst in a new prime parsing a 400-page Section L/M must choose Pursue, Pursue with conditions, Partner, No-bid using protest-exposure memo on evaluation factors after a modification adding cybersecurity work not in the PWS. The question on that file is whether the SBIR data-rights assertions are too aggressive.

HYPOTHESES TO TEST 1. A modification adding cybersecurity work not in the PWS is noise around an already-controlled Performance and Teaming process in a new prime parsing a 400-page Section L/M, given protest-exposure memo on evaluation factors. 2. A modification adding cybersecurity work not in the PWS is the event in protest-exposure memo on evaluation factors that forces Pursue for price-to-win analyst under Government RFP. 3. Protest-exposure memo on evaluation factors shows a one-file miss after a modification adding cybersecurity work not in the PWS, not a Performance and Teaming program failure. 4. Protest-exposure memo on evaluation factors cannot decide the SBIR data-rights assertions yet after a modification adding cybersecurity work not in the PWS; hold is the only Government RFP close a new prime parsing a 400-page Section L/M can defend.

ANALYSIS REQUIRED 1. Map Section L/M requirements in protest-exposure memo on evaluation factors to evaluator notes after a modification adding cybersecurity work not in the PWS. 2. Compare teaming and past-performance claims to what protest-exposure memo on evaluation factors attaches. 3. Normalize pricing and exceptions against the solicitation that governs the SBIR data-rights assertions. 4. For this Government RFP Performance and Teaming file, read protest-exposure memo on evaluation factors against a modification adding cybersecurity work not in the PWS and write the one fact that would move the SBIR data-rights assertions for price-to-win analyst.

RECOMMENDATION Choose Pursue / Pursue with conditions / Partner / No-bid on this Government RFP / Performance and Teaming packet (protest-exposure memo on evaluation factors after a modification adding cybersecurity work not in the PWS). The follow-on Performance and Teaming action is what price-to-win analyst does next: implement the option, assign an owner, and log the missing fact.

COMMAND RETURNS - Bottom-line Government RFP option on the SBIR data-rights assertions, then the evidence in protest-exposure memo on evaluation factors, then the action for price-to-win analyst - Hypothesis scorecard against protest-exposure memo on evaluation factors: supported / rejected / untestable - Owner and next date for price-to-win analyst in a new prime parsing a 400-page Section L/M - What changes the SBIR data-rights assertions if a modification adding cybersecurity work not in the PWS is later withdrawn