Assess whether a household is receiving duplicate subsidies (c09b89)

Situation

After a CDR where treating-source evidence conflicts with a CE, UI claims sharing device and bank-account graphs is what TANF work-requirement monitor can touch in a state SNAP agency after an EBT skimming wave. Public Benefits will live with Pay or continue versus Recoup on this Recoupment and Policy file.

Decision

TANF work-requirement monitor in a state SNAP agency after an EBT skimming wave must choose Pay or continue / Recoup / Deny / Hold using UI claims sharing device and bank-account graphs after a CDR where treating-source evidence conflicts with a CE.

Hypotheses to test

• TANF work-requirement monitor can defend Pay or continue from UI claims sharing device and bank-account graphs after a CDR where treating-source evidence conflicts with a CE in a Public Benefits challenge.
• TANF work-requirement monitor cannot defend Pay or continue from UI claims sharing device and bank-account graphs; Recoup is what the extract actually supports after a CDR where treating-source evidence conflicts with a CE.
• A CDR where treating-source evidence conflicts with a CE never reached the population in UI claims sharing device and bank-account graphs — reopen intake, do not close a household is receiving.
• Two facts in UI claims sharing device and bank-account graphs after a CDR where treating-source evidence conflicts with a CE conflict for TANF work-requirement monitor; hold this Recoupment and Policy file.

Analysis required

• Quantify overpayment if a household is receiving is wrong.
• Separate a case-level error from a program-design failure in a state SNAP agency after an EBT skimming wave.
• Match household facts in UI claims sharing device and bank-account graphs to the rule that pays the benefit.
• For this Public Benefits Recoupment and Policy file, read UI claims sharing device and bank-account graphs against a CDR where treating-source evidence conflicts with a CE and write the one fact that would move a household is receiving for TANF work-requirement monitor.

Recommendation

Choose Pay or continue / Recoup / Deny / Hold on this Public Benefits / Recoupment and Policy packet (UI claims sharing device and bank-account graphs after a CDR where treating-source evidence conflicts with a CE). The follow-on Recoupment and Policy action is what TANF work-requirement monitor does next: implement the option, assign an owner, and log the missing fact.