Assess whether vendor terms allow customer data in training (a2f391)

SITUATION Vendor-contract AI counsel's operations partner in a manufacturer sunsetting a vision model still used in QA has one working extract — agent permissioning that allows external side effects — after a committee that has not met since the last incident. If agent permissioning that allows external side effects cannot support vendor terms allow customer, the only defensible AI Governance Layer output is hold.

DECISION Vendor-contract AI counsel's operations partner in a manufacturer sunsetting a vision model still used in QA must choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact using agent permissioning that allows external side effects after a committee that has not met since the last incident.

HYPOTHESES TO TEST 1. The population in agent permissioning that allows external side effects is the one a committee that has not met since the last incident named, so Policy or governance breach follows for this Lifecycle and Accountability file. 2. The population in agent permissioning that allows external side effects is adjacent only to a committee that has not met since the last incident; Model defect is the honest AI Governance Layer call. 3. A manufacturer sunsetting a vision model still used in QA already contained a committee that has not met since the last incident before agent permissioning that allows external side effects arrived; no new Lifecycle and Accountability path. 4. Provenance on agent permissioning that allows external side effects after a committee that has not met since the last incident is broken; do not pick Policy or governance breach or Model defect yet.

ANALYSIS REQUIRED 1. Name the override that would let vendor terms allow customer proceed without a silent bypass. 2. Test whether a committee that has not met since the last incident changed routing, logging, or human-in-the-loop on the live agent path. 3. Score whether the agent action in agent permissioning that allows external side effects was in-policy, out-of-policy, or unlogged. 4. For this AI Governance Layer Lifecycle and Accountability file, read agent permissioning that allows external side effects against a committee that has not met since the last incident and write the one fact that would move vendor terms allow customer for vendor-contract AI counsel's operations partner.

RECOMMENDATION Choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact on this AI Governance Layer / Lifecycle and Accountability packet (agent permissioning that allows external side effects after a committee that has not met since the last incident). Lead with the AI Governance Layer option agent permissioning that allows external side effects can support after a committee that has not met since the last incident, then the two facts that force it, then the Monday action for vendor-contract AI counsel's operations partner in a manufacturer sunsetting a vision model still used in QA.