Assess whether disagreement should block, queue, or log (2f84ef)

SITUATION A manufacturer sunsetting a vision model still used in QA cannot treat an examiner asking who authorized last Tuesday's model output as incidental context on content-attribution tags missing on customer-facing copy. Vendor-contract AI counsel's operations partner must close disagreement should block, queue, from that extract under AI Governance Layer / Lifecycle and Accountability.

DECISION Vendor-contract AI counsel's operations partner in a manufacturer sunsetting a vision model still used in QA must choose Disagreement should block, queue, / Log using content-attribution tags missing on customer-facing copy after an examiner asking who authorized last Tuesday's model output.

HYPOTHESES TO TEST 1. An examiner asking who authorized last Tuesday's model output is noise around an already-controlled Lifecycle and Accountability process in a manufacturer sunsetting a vision model still used in QA, given content-attribution tags missing on customer-facing copy. 2. An examiner asking who authorized last Tuesday's model output is the event in content-attribution tags missing on customer-facing copy that forces Disagreement should block, queue, for vendor-contract AI counsel's operations partner under AI Governance Layer. 3. Content-attribution tags missing on customer-facing copy shows a one-file miss after an examiner asking who authorized last Tuesday's model output, not a Lifecycle and Accountability program failure. 4. Content-attribution tags missing on customer-facing copy cannot decide disagreement should block, queue, yet after an examiner asking who authorized last Tuesday's model output; hold is the only AI Governance Layer close a manufacturer sunsetting a vision model still used in QA can defend.

ANALYSIS REQUIRED 1. Confirm the inventory line still matches the running configuration in a manufacturer sunsetting a vision model still used in QA. 2. Map the control-plane score in content-attribution tags missing on customer-facing copy to the policy gate vendor-contract AI counsel's operations partner can enforce. 3. Name the override that would let disagreement should block, queue, proceed without a silent bypass. 4. For this AI Governance Layer Lifecycle and Accountability file, read content-attribution tags missing on customer-facing copy against an examiner asking who authorized last Tuesday's model output and write the one fact that would move disagreement should block, queue, for vendor-contract AI counsel's operations partner.

RECOMMENDATION Choose Disagreement should block, queue, / Log on this AI Governance Layer / Lifecycle and Accountability packet (content-attribution tags missing on customer-facing copy after an examiner asking who authorized last Tuesday's model output). The follow-on Lifecycle and Accountability action is what vendor-contract AI counsel's operations partner does next: implement the option, assign an owner, and log the missing fact.