Assess whether an alternate source is technically qualified (7fcfb5)

SITUATION Depot Procurement Intelligence work in a sustainment cell after a failed repair turnaround now turns on an alternate source is because a BPA used for what looks like a major end item put scrap-and-condemnation spike on one NSN in play. Vendor-base mapper should say what scrap-and-condemnation spike on one NSN proves.

DECISION Vendor-base mapper in a sustainment cell after a failed repair turnaround must choose Fund and move materiel / Cannibalize or substitute / Defer a cycle / Hold using scrap-and-condemnation spike on one NSN after a BPA used for what looks like a major end item.

HYPOTHESES TO TEST 1. The population in scrap-and-condemnation spike on one NSN is the one a BPA used for what looks like a major end item named, so Fund and move materiel follows for this Depot Procurement Intelligence file. 2. The population in scrap-and-condemnation spike on one NSN is adjacent only to a BPA used for what looks like a major end item; Cannibalize or substitute is the honest Defense Sustainment call. 3. A sustainment cell after a failed repair turnaround already contained a BPA used for what looks like a major end item before scrap-and-condemnation spike on one NSN arrived; no new Depot Procurement Intelligence path. 4. Provenance on scrap-and-condemnation spike on one NSN after a BPA used for what looks like a major end item is broken; do not pick Fund and move materiel or Cannibalize or substitute yet.

ANALYSIS REQUIRED 1. Compare on-hand, due-in, and condemned quantities in scrap-and-condemnation spike on one NSN. 2. Quantify mission impact if an alternate source is is deferred one cycle in a sustainment cell after a failed repair turnaround. 3. Reconcile depot demand in scrap-and-condemnation spike on one NSN to fleet readiness and NSN coverage after a BPA used for what looks like a major end item. 4. For this Defense Sustainment Depot Procurement Intelligence file, read scrap-and-condemnation spike on one NSN against a BPA used for what looks like a major end item and write the one fact that would move an alternate source is for vendor-base mapper.

RECOMMENDATION Choose Fund and move materiel / Cannibalize or substitute / Defer a cycle / Hold on this Defense Sustainment / Depot Procurement Intelligence packet (scrap-and-condemnation spike on one NSN after a BPA used for what looks like a major end item). The follow-on Depot Procurement Intelligence action is what vendor-base mapper does next: implement the option, assign an owner, and log the missing fact.

COMMAND RETURNS - Bottom-line Defense Sustainment option on an alternate source is, then the evidence in scrap-and-condemnation spike on one NSN, then the action for vendor-base mapper - Hypothesis scorecard against scrap-and-condemnation spike on one NSN: supported / rejected / untestable - Named option among Fund and move materiel, Cannibalize or substitute, Defer a cycle and the fact that kills the others - Owner and next date for vendor-base mapper in a sustainment cell after a failed repair turnaround