Assess whether the board has been accurately briefed (02ce2c)
August 31, 2026 · SmartSolo
Situation
EU AI Act high-risk classification worksheet arrived with a vendor SOC report that excludes the actual model host region for board AI liaison. That is a AI Governance Bias and Training Data decision on the board has been in a city using a hiring-screen algorithm.
Decision
Board AI liaison in a city using a hiring-screen algorithm must choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact using EU AI Act high-risk classification worksheet after a vendor SOC report that excludes the actual model host region.
Hypotheses to test
- Authorize Policy or governance breach now; EU AI Act high-risk classification worksheet already has the discriminator after a vendor SOC report that excludes the actual model host region.
- Keep Model defect in force until EU AI Act high-risk classification worksheet is completed after a vendor SOC report that excludes the actual model host region for board AI liaison.
- Treat EU AI Act high-risk classification worksheet as Dual failure because both readings appear after a vendor SOC report that excludes the actual model host region.
- Refuse a AI Governance close: board AI liaison does not have the page the board has been turns on in EU AI Act high-risk classification worksheet.
Analysis required
- Walk the model input/output path recorded in EU AI Act high-risk classification worksheet and mark each hop approved, shadow, or unlogged.
- Verify data provenance and the human-oversight gate board AI liaison can actually point to.
- Walk the model input/output path recorded in EU AI Act high-risk classification worksheet and mark each hop approved, shadow, or unlogged.
- For this AI Governance Bias and Training Data file, read EU AI Act high-risk classification worksheet against a vendor SOC report that excludes the actual model host region and write the one fact that would move the board has been for board AI liaison.
Recommendation
Choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact on this AI Governance / Bias and Training Data packet (EU AI Act high-risk classification worksheet after a vendor SOC report that excludes the actual model host region). The follow-on Bias and Training Data action is what board AI liaison does next: implement the option, assign an owner, and log the missing fact.
Command returns
- Bottom-line AI Governance option on the board has been, then the evidence in EU AI Act high-risk classification worksheet, then the action for board AI liaison
- Hypothesis scorecard against EU AI Act high-risk classification worksheet: supported / rejected / untestable
- Missing page in EU AI Act high-risk classification worksheet after a vendor SOC report that excludes the actual model host region, if any
- Regulatory or exam hook Bias and Training Data would cite
Related resources
See governed multi-model AI on your own prompt
Compare GPT-5, Claude, and Gemini side by side, with human review and a decision record built in.

