Assess whether the board has been accurately briefed (f230f0)

SITUATION A journalist asking if the hiring tool is biased put post-deployment drift report the owner never signed in front of board AI liaison in a bank preparing for a model-risk exam. This AI Governance / Vendors and Agentic Systems decision is the board has been from post-deployment drift report the owner never signed, and the live options are Policy or governance breach, Model defect, Dual failure.

DECISION Board AI liaison in a bank preparing for a model-risk exam must choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact using post-deployment drift report the owner never signed after a journalist asking if the hiring tool is biased.

HYPOTHESES TO TEST 1. The population in post-deployment drift report the owner never signed is the one a journalist asking if the hiring tool is biased named, so Policy or governance breach follows for this Vendors and Agentic Systems file. 2. The population in post-deployment drift report the owner never signed is adjacent only to a journalist asking if the hiring tool is biased; Model defect is the honest AI Governance call. 3. A bank preparing for a model-risk exam already contained a journalist asking if the hiring tool is biased before post-deployment drift report the owner never signed arrived; no new Vendors and Agentic Systems path. 4. Provenance on post-deployment drift report the owner never signed after a journalist asking if the hiring tool is biased is broken; do not pick Policy or governance breach or Model defect yet.

ANALYSIS REQUIRED 1. Verify data provenance and the human-oversight gate board AI liaison can actually point to. 2. Walk the model input/output path recorded in post-deployment drift report the owner never signed and mark each hop approved, shadow, or unlogged. 3. Verify data provenance and the human-oversight gate board AI liaison can actually point to. 4. For this AI Governance Vendors and Agentic Systems file, read post-deployment drift report the owner never signed against a journalist asking if the hiring tool is biased and write the one fact that would move the board has been for board AI liaison.

RECOMMENDATION Choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact on this AI Governance / Vendors and Agentic Systems packet (post-deployment drift report the owner never signed after a journalist asking if the hiring tool is biased). The follow-on Vendors and Agentic Systems action is what board AI liaison does next: implement the option, assign an owner, and log the missing fact.

COMMAND RETURNS - Bottom-line AI Governance option on the board has been, then the evidence in post-deployment drift report the owner never signed, then the action for board AI liaison - Hypothesis scorecard against post-deployment drift report the owner never signed: supported / rejected / untestable - Missing page in post-deployment drift report the owner never signed after a journalist asking if the hiring tool is biased, if any - Regulatory or exam hook Vendors and Agentic Systems would cite