Assess whether the carve-out is operable on day one (6aff1e)
August 31, 2026
SITUATION Separation and Integration work in a health-system acquiring a specialty practice now turns on the carve-out is operable because an earnout based on 'adjusted EBITDA' with no dictionary put working-capital peg versus seasonal reality in play. Integration-risk PMO should say what working-capital peg versus seasonal reality proves.
DECISION Integration-risk PMO in a health-system acquiring a specialty practice must choose Proceed / Reprice / Walk / Hold using working-capital peg versus seasonal reality after an earnout based on 'adjusted EBITDA' with no dictionary.
HYPOTHESES TO TEST 1. The population in working-capital peg versus seasonal reality is the one an earnout based on 'adjusted EBITDA' with no dictionary named, so Proceed follows for this Separation and Integration file. 2. The population in working-capital peg versus seasonal reality is adjacent only to an earnout based on 'adjusted EBITDA' with no dictionary; Reprice is the honest M&A Due Diligence call. 3. A health-system acquiring a specialty practice already contained an earnout based on 'adjusted EBITDA' with no dictionary before working-capital peg versus seasonal reality arrived; no new Separation and Integration path. 4. Provenance on working-capital peg versus seasonal reality after an earnout based on 'adjusted EBITDA' with no dictionary is broken; do not pick Proceed or Reprice yet.
ANALYSIS REQUIRED 1. Name the document integration-risk PMO still needs before signing. 2. Test whether an earnout based on 'adjusted EBITDA' with no dictionary is a diligence gap, a price chip, or a walk-away. 3. Separate a one-off add-back from a recurring earnings issue in working-capital peg versus seasonal reality. 4. For this M&A Due Diligence Separation and Integration file, read working-capital peg versus seasonal reality against an earnout based on 'adjusted EBITDA' with no dictionary and write the one fact that would move the carve-out is operable for integration-risk PMO.
RECOMMENDATION Choose Proceed / Reprice / Walk / Hold on this M&A Due Diligence / Separation and Integration packet (working-capital peg versus seasonal reality after an earnout based on 'adjusted EBITDA' with no dictionary). Lead with the M&A Due Diligence option working-capital peg versus seasonal reality can support after an earnout based on 'adjusted EBITDA' with no dictionary, then the two facts that force it, then the Monday action for integration-risk PMO in a health-system acquiring a specialty practice.
COMMAND RETURNS - Bottom-line M&A Due Diligence option on the carve-out is operable, then the evidence in working-capital peg versus seasonal reality, then the action for integration-risk PMO - Hypothesis scorecard against working-capital peg versus seasonal reality: supported / rejected / untestable - Regulatory or exam hook Separation and Integration would cite - Separation and Integration finding in working-capital peg versus seasonal reality that a second reviewer can re-perform
Explore more
More M&A Due Diligence prompts
- Assess whether related-party sales should be backed out of valuation (5b8807)
- Assess whether related-party sales should be backed out of valuation (d51b79)
- Assess whether to re-trade, restructure, or drop (3a0946)
- Assess whether management can run this without the founder (a57611)
- Assess whether earnings quality supports the bid price (a9f999)
Explore related decision areas
- Assess whether cash ever economically changed hands (b1b289)Forensic Accounting
- Commercial property underwriter must resolve whether telematics improvementsInsurance Underwriting
- Assess whether claimed differentiators would survive a fact check (ba371a)Government RFP
See governed multi-model AI on your own prompt
Compare GPT-5, Claude, and Gemini side by side, with human review and a decision record built in.

