Assess whether CMMC gaps are bid-killers or post-award plans (32337e)

Situation

A lab competing a Phase II SBIR cannot treat a key person who just resigned as color commentary on past-performance recency and relevance scorecard. Contracts officer supporting a bid must close CMMC gaps are bid-killers from that extract under Government RFP / Performance and Teaming.

Decision

Contracts officer supporting a bid in a lab competing a Phase II SBIR must choose CMMC gaps are bid-killers / Post-award plans using past-performance recency and relevance scorecard after a key person who just resigned.

Hypotheses to test

• Past-performance recency and relevance scorecard reads as CMMC gaps are bid-killers once a key person who just resigned is lined up to the same Government RFP population.
• Past-performance recency and relevance scorecard is closer to Post-award plans after a key person who just resigned; CMMC gaps are bid-killers would over-claim this Performance and Teaming extract.
• A dual reading is still live in past-performance recency and relevance scorecard for contracts officer supporting a bid in a lab competing a Phase II SBIR.
• Past-performance recency and relevance scorecard is missing the fact contracts officer supporting a bid needs after a key person who just resigned; stop this Government RFP close.

Analysis required

• Test OCI, QASP, and mandatory evaluation rights a lab competing a Phase II SBIR cannot waive quietly.
• Map Section L/M requirements in past-performance recency and relevance scorecard to evaluator notes after a key person who just resigned.
• Compare teaming and past-performance claims to what past-performance recency and relevance scorecard attaches.
• For this Government RFP Performance and Teaming file, read past-performance recency and relevance scorecard against a key person who just resigned and write the one fact that would move CMMC gaps are bid-killers for contracts officer supporting a bid.

Recommendation

Choose CMMC gaps are bid-killers / Post-award plans on this Government RFP / Performance and Teaming packet (past-performance recency and relevance scorecard after a key person who just resigned). If past-performance recency and relevance scorecard cannot force a Government RFP label under Performance and Teaming, stop. If past-performance recency and relevance scorecard after a key person who just resigned cannot support CMMC gaps are bid-killers versus Post-award plans on this Government RFP Performance and Teaming close, contracts officer supporting a bid must identify the Section L/M or evaluation criterion that remains unproven rather than filling the gap.